Croydon Health Services NHS Trust (24 012 215a)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Hospital acute services 11-Mar-2025

Summary: Mr A complained about the way his aunt, Mrs B, was cared for after she left hospital. The organisations wanted her to go into a nursing home and made it difficult for her to return home. There were problems with communication and equipment delivery. We will not investigate this complaint because the Trust accepted it made mistakes and apologised to Mr A and has improved its service. We consider this to be a suitable remedy.

St Georges University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (23 017 554a)

Statement Upheld Education, health and care plans 07-Mar-2025

Summary: Ms X complains about delays by the Council and the Trust in completing an autism assessment for her child and for not fast‑tracking their assessment. We found fault with the initial referral, but the Trust has already remedied this. We also found fault with the triage panel meeting that led to some delay. We did not find fault by the Council and the Trust with how they considered Ms X’s fast‑track request. However, fault with a panel meeting led to some uncertainty about whether this could have been considered sooner. We have recommended the Trust and the Council take actions to address the faults and apologise for the distress caused to Ms X.

St Georges University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (23 017 554b)

Statement Upheld Education, health and care plans 07-Mar-2025

Summary: Ms X complains about delays by the Council and the Trust in completing an autism assessment for her child and for not fast‑tracking their assessment. We found fault with the initial referral, but the Trust has already remedied this. We also found fault with the triage panel meeting that led to some delay. We did not find fault by the Council and the Trust with how they considered Ms X’s fast‑track request. However, fault with a panel meeting led to some uncertainty about whether this could have been considered sooner. We have recommended the Trust and the Council take actions to address the faults and apologise for the distress caused to Ms X.

Leicester General Hospital NHS Trust (24 001 615a)

Statement Upheld Hospital acute services 07-Mar-2025

Summary: We uphold Mrs X’s complaint about the way her husband, Mr X, was discharged from hospital and the care he received in a care home. We found fault with how Leicestershire County Council and Leicestershire General Hospital NHS Trust discharged Mr X. We also found fault with some aspects of Mr X’s care. As a result, Mr X did not always receive appropriate care and Mrs X was caused distress and uncertainty. The Council and the Trust will apologise to Mrs X and pay her a total of £400. The Council will also make some systemic improvements. We did not find fault with Queens Road Surgery.

Queens Road Surgery (24 001 615b)

Statement Not upheld General practice 07-Mar-2025

Summary: We uphold Mrs X’s complaint about the way her husband, Mr X, was discharged from hospital and the care he received in a care home. We found fault with how Leicestershire County Council and Leicestershire General Hospital NHS Trust discharged Mr X. We also found fault with some aspects of Mr X’s care. As a result, Mr X did not always receive appropriate care and Mrs X was caused distress and uncertainty. The Council and the Trust will apologise to Mrs X and pay her a total of £400. The Council will also make some systemic improvements. We did not find fault with Queens Road Surgery.

NHS Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes Integrated Care Board (23 000 946a)

Statement Upheld Assessment and funding 27-Feb-2025

Summary: Mrs G complained about the decision by NHS Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes Integrated Care Board (the ICB) to reduce the night-time support for her child, D. She also complained about the way Milton Keynes Council (the Council) considered respite for the family and a preferred placement. We found fault in the way the ICB decided to reduce night-time support as it did not follow the recommendations from an independent assessment or properly consider the impact its decision would have on D’s parents. This likely caused D’s parents avoidable worry and distress. The Council did not provide enough support to meet the family’s needs but acted to put things right during our investigation. There was a lack of joined up working when assessing D’s health and social care needs. The ICB and Council have accepted our recommendations to complete a holistic review of D’s needs, apologise to Mrs G, make acknowledgement payments and improve their processes. We have now completed our investigation.

NHS Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes Integrated Care Board (23 000 946b)

Statement Upheld Assessment and funding 27-Feb-2025

Summary: Mrs G complained about the decision by NHS Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes Integrated Care Board (the ICB) to reduce the night-time support for her child, D. She also complained about the way Milton Keynes Council (the Council) considered respite for the family and a preferred placement. We found fault in the way the ICB decided to reduce night-time support as it did not follow the recommendations from an independent assessment or properly consider the impact its decision would have on D’s parents. This likely caused D’s parents avoidable worry and distress. The Council did not provide enough support to meet the family’s needs but acted to put things right during our investigation. There was a lack of joined up working when assessing D’s health and social care needs. The ICB and Council have accepted our recommendations to complete a holistic review of D’s needs, apologise to Mrs G, make acknowledgement payments and improve their processes. We have now completed our investigation.

Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (24 017 321a)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Mental health services 24-Feb-2025

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint. This is because, in relation to some parts of the complaint, an investigation would be unlikely to achieve the outcomes Miss X is seeking. The other parts of the complaint are not ready for our consideration as work is ongoing locally to review Miss X’s care and support needs.

East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust (24 003 412a)

Statement Upheld Hospital acute services 24-Feb-2025

Summary: We found no fault with the support provided to Mrs Y by a Council following her discharge from hospital. Nor did we find any fault with the information provided to Mrs Y’s family regarding charging arrangements for her care. We found fault with a Trust’s failure to refer Mrs Y for rehabilitation at the point of discharge. This delayed her access to therapy. The Trust will apologise and pay a financial remedy.

Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (24 009 886a)

Statement Closed after initial enquiries Hospital acute services 21-Feb-2025

Summary: We will not investigate Mr and Mrs X’s complaint about the way Mrs X’s brother, Mr Y, was discharged from hospital by Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council. The Trust has already accepted some errors and taken appropriate steps to put things right. Further investigation by the Ombudsmen is unlikely to add to the Trust’s investigation.