Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Care and treatment


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Molescroft Nursing Home (Holdings) Limited (18 015 760)

    Statement Upheld Care and treatment 26-Jul-2021

    Summary: Kingston Upon Hull City Council, Molescroft Nursing Home Limited and Barchester Healthcare Homes Limited all acted with fault when supporting Mrs B. Those faults include personal care, unfairly charging a top-up, best interest decision making, safeguarding investigations, and complaint handling. Those faults had an emotional and financial impact on Mrs B's son, Mr A.

  • Molescroft Nursing Home (Holdings) Limited (18 015 760)

    Statement Upheld Care and treatment 26-Jul-2021

    Summary: Kingston Upon Hull City Council, Molescroft Nursing Home Limited and Barchester Healthcare Homes Limited all acted with fault when supporting Mrs B. Those faults include personal care, unfairly charging a top-up, best interest decision making, safeguarding investigations, and complaint handling. Those faults had an emotional and financial impact on Mrs B's son, Mr A.

  • Barchester Healthcare Homes Limited (18 015 760)

    Statement Upheld Care and treatment 26-Jul-2021

    Summary: Kingston Upon Hull City Council, Molescroft Nursing Home Limited and Barchester Healthcare Homes Limited all acted with fault when supporting Mrs B. Those faults include personal care, unfairly charging a top-up, best interest decision making, safeguarding investigations, and complaint handling. Those faults had an emotional and financial impact on Mrs B's son, Mr A.

  • Barchester Healthcare Homes Limited (18 015 760)

    Statement Upheld Care and treatment 26-Jul-2021

    Summary: Kingston Upon Hull City Council, Molescroft Nursing Home Limited and Barchester Healthcare Homes Limited all acted with fault when supporting Mrs B. Those faults include personal care, unfairly charging a top-up, best interest decision making, safeguarding investigations, and complaint handling. Those faults had an emotional and financial impact on Mrs B's son, Mr A.

  • Bondcare (London) Limited (19 007 669)

    Statement Upheld Care and treatment 26-Apr-2021

    Summary: The Ombudsmen find fault in the way a Care Home monitored and recorded the condition of a resident's foot. However, the Care Home has already accepted this failing and taken suitable action to improve its practice. The Ombudsmen has not found fault in the Care Home's actions during a week in late October 2018 as there no clear indications it should have escalated the resident's care during that time.

  • Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Clinical Commissioning Group (18 014 139)

    Statement Upheld Care and treatment 04-Dec-2020

    Summary: The Care Provider did not explain the extra charge it made for a 'lifestyle premium' and we cannot be sure that the complainant, the late Mrs J, would have chosen to pay this. It has agreed to refund half the total amount to Mrs J's estate and review the advice it gives about this. The Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Occupational Therapy service failed to complete an assessment and so it could not fund a specialist chair for Mrs J and she had to be nursed in bed. The CCG should refund the cost of the chair to the daughter and pay her £300 in recognition of her distress. It should also review how its OT provision is organised.