Local Government Ombudsman Logo

www.lgo.org.uk has experienced a problem

The website has encountered an error. The issue has been logged so that we can investigate the cause.

You can visit the home page and try browsing again. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.

You may still be able to use our online complaint service if you want to register a complaint or log into your account.

SearchResult - Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 52409 results

  • London Borough of Bexley (24 019 166)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 13-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s investigation into a safeguarding incident. This is because the injustice is not sufficient to warrant an investigation.

  • West Lancashire Borough Council (24 002 064)

    Statement Upheld Enforcement 13-May-2025

    Summary: Mr X complained that the Council failed to pursue enforcement action regarding development next to his home. There was fault by the Council due to delay and lack of communication. It has agreed a remedy

  • Staffordshire County Council (24 004 134)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 13-May-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complained the Council failed to complete an Education, Health and Care needs assessment for Y within the statutory time limits, and failed to ensure she received suitable education while she was out of school. Mrs X said this caused her real stress and meant she incurred additional expenses. We find the Council at fault. The Council has agreed to apologise, make a payment to recognise the injustice and act to prevent recurrence.

  • Telford & Wrekin Council (24 007 302)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 13-May-2025

    Summary: We have found fault with the Council for failing to secure the therapy set out in Mrs X’s daughter’s Education, Health and Care Plan. This caused her to miss out on the therapy she needed. The Council has agreed to apologise and make a symbolic payment to Mrs X in recognition of the missed provision.

  • London Borough of Lambeth (24 019 622)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 13-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

  • London Borough of Ealing (24 020 281)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 13-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing transfer application. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

  • Boston Borough Council (24 020 401)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Homelessness 13-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the lack of support provided by the Council in relation to her homeless application and about the priority band her housing register was awarded. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

  • London Borough of Islington (24 020 760)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 13-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about how the Council dealt with her concerns that her child’s Special Educational Needs were not being met. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault causing a significant injustice.

  • Huntingdonshire District Council (24 020 778)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 13-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to take formal action regarding the condition of his neighbour’s land. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making process to warrant us investigating.

  • HC-One No.2 Limited (24 020 830)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Residential care 13-May-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Care Provider preventing access to one of its residents. The Care Provider was acting on the wishes of the resident, who had capacity to decide. So, the actions of the Care Provider do not cause the claimed injustice. There is also nothing to now achieve as the resident has since died.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings