City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (25 010 565)

Category : Adult care services > Safeguarding

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about adult safeguarding because there is not enough evidence of fault. We have no powers to consider concerns about the standard of care arranged by the NHS.

The complaint

  1. Mr B says a care provider failed to provide his relative, Ms C, with the required level of care and medication at the end of her life. This causes him depression and anxiety and he is having therapy.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about councils and certain other bodies. We cannot investigate the actions of bodies such as Integrated Care Boards. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 25 and 34(1), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr B complains about neglect at the end of Ms C’s life. The Ombudsman can consider care arranged by a council or care that is arranged privately. Ms C’s care was arranged by an Integrated Care Board which is an NHS body. We have no powers to consider its actions or actions of the care provider on its behalf.
  2. The Council’s only involvement was as the local safeguarding authority. The Council received a safeguarding referral. It did not trigger a full enquiry because Ms C had died so was no longer at risk. The Council gathered and shared some information with its commissioning and quality team and spoke with Mr B to say what it had done.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because we have no powers to consider the main concerns about the standard of care arranged by the NHS. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation into how the Council dealt with the safeguarding alert.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings