Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 49843 results

  • Surrey County Council (24 016 970)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School transport 01-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse the complainant’s application and appeal for school transport for his daughter. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council’s part to warrant investigation.

  • West Sussex County Council (24 009 520)

    Statement Upheld Child protection 28-Feb-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complained about the Council’s decision to start child protection action and put her child on a child protection plan. The Council accepted fault in failing to share information about the process with Mrs X, and apologised for the distress caused. We found the Council’s failings did not affect its decision, and its apology is sufficient remedy for the injustice.

  • Bristol City Council (24 009 694)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 28-Feb-2025

    Summary: We have discontinued our investigation into Mrs C’s complaint about the way the Council dealt with her business rates account. This is because, the courts decided she owes the rates. So we will not investigate further.

  • Warwickshire County Council (24 013 077)

    Statement Upheld Other 28-Feb-2025

    Summary: We upheld this complaint about how the Council’s review panel handled Mr X’s complaint about the lack of support provided to his family during the Child in Need (CIN) process. The Council agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a financial remedy for the injustice caused.

  • Isle of Wight Council (24 014 001)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Homelessness 28-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council placing Miss X in unsuitable accommodation when she became homeless. The Council moved Miss X without delay following her complaints and ensured a working heater was available. It is not required to cover her laundry costs, but did make a one-off payment. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

  • Portsmouth City Council (24 014 145)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Residential care 28-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint the Council failed to provide her with her mother’s complete care records. This is because the complaint is late and there are no good reasons to exercise discretion to consider the late complaint. In addition, there is insufficient evidence of fault.

  • Sheffield City Council (24 014 489)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 28-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to investigate the source of water flooding on the highway outside the complainant’s house. We have not seen enough evidence of fault in the Councils actions. The water originates from private property. The Council is not responsible for carrying out investigation works on private property and we cannot require it to carry out such an investigation.

  • Nottinghamshire Police and Crime Commissioner (24 014 616)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 28-Feb-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the conduct of the Police and Crime Commissioner because it is in connection with underlying policing matters including the prevention and detection of crime.

  • Unity Homes Limited (24 015 182)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Charging 28-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that his late father’s care provider failed to raise invoices for care fees in a timely manner. This is because the likely fault has not caused any significant injustice.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (24 015 491)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 28-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council rejecting Mr X’s housing application. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council that is likely to have significantly affected the Council’s decision.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings