Liverpool City Council (25 014 242)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 24 Mar 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council completed a single assessment. This is because the Council remedied the injustice caused to Mr X during its complaint’s process.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained a single assessment did not contain or reflect his views and was biased against him.
  2. Mr X complained the Council stopped contact with his children and it affected his mental health. He wants the Council to apologise and safeguard his children.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council completed a single assessment to inform a child protection review conference. Mr X complained the assessment did not include his views and the Council said it did not take his views into account.
  2. The assessment records that Mr X does not have parental responsibility, so it was difficult to engage him.
  3. In its complaint response the Council acknowledged that it did not include Mr X’s views in the assessment. It said Mr X’s parental responsibility was unknown at the time, but it should have clarified his position in more detail.
  4. The Council offered Mr X a symbolic payment of £200 in recognition that he did not contribute to the assessment. This is an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused to Mr X and therefore we will not investigate this complaint.
  5. Mr X complained the Council stopped contact with is children. The law says we have no legal jurisdiction to investigate any matter subject to court action. Therefore, we cannot investigate this matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because the Council remedied the injustice caused to Mr X during its complaint’s process.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings