Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 57388 results

  • London Borough of Hounslow (25 013 447)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 06-May-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Ms X’s housing register application because there is insufficient evidence of fault in its decision-making to justify our involvement.

  • London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (25 014 539)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 06-May-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her homelessness application because there is insufficient evidence of fault. The Council has offered an appropriate payment for its delay in issuing a housing register decision and further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

  • London Borough of Waltham Forest (25 014 721)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 06-May-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint she was not accepted on to the Council’s housing register. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s application of its policy to justify investigating.

  • London Borough of Enfield (25 014 926)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Trees 06-May-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about damage to her property caused by a Council-owned tree. It is unlikely an investigation would lead to a different outcome and if Ms X is dissatisfied with the outcome of her insurance claim, it is reasonable for her to take the matter to court.

  • Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (25 015 086)

    Statement Upheld Homelessness 06-May-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s homeless application. The Council has already accepted fault and provided a suitable remedy for the injustice caused.

  • Test Valley Borough Council (25 015 430)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 06-May-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mr X’s application for social housing. Mr X had a right to review the Council’s decision about his bedroom entitlement which it was reasonable for him to use. There is not enough evidence of injustice to Mr X from the Council’s response to his hypothetical question to justify investigating.

  • Cornwall Council (25 016 272)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Rights of way 06-May-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council responded to reports of obstruction on a bridleway. This is because Mrs X has appeal rights to the Magistrates Court which we would reasonably expect her to use, so placing the complaint outside our jurisdiction.

  • London Borough of Barking & Dagenham (25 016 330)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 06-May-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a Controlled Parking Zone. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.

  • City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (25 016 477)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 06-May-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council not providing suitable education to Mr Y and not complying with the agreed actions following a previous Ombudsman investigation. The complaints are late and there are no good reasons to investigate them now. We cannot achieve anything for Mrs X and Mr Y by investigating the complaint about the Council not providing transport for Mr Y.

  • Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (25 016 518)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 06-May-2026

    Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint regarding antisocial behaviour at Mr X’s previous property, which has been brought to the Ombudsman out of time.  The time that has lapsed is likely to hinder an effective investigation, and it is unlikely that an investigation will reach Mr X’s desired outcome of additional compensation and securing accommodation in the private sector.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings