Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 56238 results

  • Blackburn with Darwen Council (25 016 458)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 17-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to not take enforcement action to remove invasive plants. There is no evidence of Mrs X suffering a significant injustice and there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our involvement.

  • Leeds City Council (25 016 550)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 17-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council handled an application for a certificate of lawful development. This is because Mr X could have appealed to the Planning Inspectorate. We will not investigate the way the Council handled the planning enforcement case because there is not enough significant injustice to warrant an investigation.

  • London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (25 016 794)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Adoption 17-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council failed to notify him about a court hearing. This is because it concerns the Council’s conduct as part of court proceedings and raises issues that were, or could reasonably have been, considered by the court.

  • London Borough of Sutton (25 016 838)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Private housing 17-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how the Council responded to reports of disrepair in his privately rented home. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s processes to justify an investigation.

  • Kent County Council (25 016 854)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 17-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s duties under the Equality Act 2010 and how it applied statutory guidance to ensure Miss X’s child could attend a funded nursery place. This is because we are unlikely to find fault in the Council’s actions.

  • London Borough of Newham (25 016 904)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 17-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s council tax enforcement action. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation. We cannot investigate court proceedings, and Ms X can refer to The Information Commissioner about her request for evidence of the enforcement agent’s visit.

  • Chelmsford City Council (25 016 973)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 17-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint that the Council ignored the police’s request for CCTV footage. This is because we could not add to the response already provided via the Council’s investigation of the matter. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council issuing fake parking tickets. This is because this did not form part of Ms X’s complaint to the Council and so the Council has not yet had the opportunity to consider it.

  • Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council (25 017 101)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway repair and maintenance 17-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s maintenance of trees on a highway, and how the Council dealt with Mr X’s complaint. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

  • North Yorkshire Council (25 017 235)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 17-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an outstanding council tax balance. Mr X’s claimed injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets (25 017 236)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 17-Mar-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO) handling of Mrs X’s complaint. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s action to justify an investigation. Other school and personnel matters are outside our remit.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings