Decision search
Your search has 53740 results
-
Liverpool City Council (25 007 281)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 22-Sep-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her correspondence about a Penalty Charge Notice. This is because Miss X has challenged the Council’s escalation of the case at court and if she disagreed with the Penalty Charge Notice it would have been reasonable for her to have used her right of appeal.
-
Statement Upheld Other 22-Sep-2025
Summary: We have upheld Mr X’s complaint because the Council delayed considering his complaint at stage two of the children’s statutory complaints procedure. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Mr X.
-
London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (25 012 355)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 22-Sep-2025
Summary: We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice he received for an alleged moving traffic contravention. This is because Mr B put in an appeal to London Tribunals.
-
London Borough of Lambeth (25 012 401)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 22-Sep-2025
Summary: We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice he received for an alleged moving traffic contravention. This is because Mr B put in an appeal to London Tribunals.
-
London Borough of Southwark (25 013 005)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 22-Sep-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice for an alleged moving traffic contravention. This is because Mr B appealed to London Tribunals which found the contravention took place. And, the Council considered Mr B’s mitigating circumstances when it responded to his representations.
-
Transport for London (25 013 577)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 22-Sep-2025
Summary: We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice he received for an alleged moving traffic contravention. This is because Mr B put in an appeal to London Tribunals.
-
London Borough of Hackney (24 018 714)
Statement Upheld Direct payments 21-Sep-2025
Summary: The Council failed to meet some of Miss X’s eligible care needs, causing Miss X distress and frustration. The Council also delayed carrying out a review of Miss X’s needs, causing Miss X’s sister, Ms Y, uncertainty and frustration. The Council was entitled to suspend Miss X’s direct payments but has since failed to resolve the issues which led to the suspension. The Council should apologise to Miss X and Ms Y, make a payment to Miss X, and decide how it will meet her needs following a mental capacity assessment.
-
London Borough of Newham (24 018 863)
Statement Upheld Homelessness 21-Sep-2025
Summary: Mr X complains the Council failed to provide him with interim accommodation when he made a second homelessness application in July 2024. The Council was at fault for ending interim accommodation too early after Mr X made a homelessness application in July 2024. It also delayed in completing his review request. This left Mr X homeless and caused avoidable distress and uncertainty. The Council will apologise, make a financial payment, and remind staff of the correct legal duties.
-
Surrey County Council (24 019 139)
Statement Upheld Alternative provision 21-Sep-2025
Summary: The Council failed to consult sufficient school placements for Ms X’s child, Y, when they stopped attending school. The Council also failed to properly consider whether the alternative provision it offered Y was reasonably accessible to them and failed to ensure Y received key therapies in their Education, Health and Care Plan. The Council’s faults have caused Y and Ms X uncertainty and caused Y to avoidably miss out on special educational provision for eleven months. The Council has paid Ms X £3,250 to recognise the injustice caused by these faults. We have also recommended that the Council make service improvements.
-
Teignbridge District Council (24 020 107)
Statement Not upheld Other 21-Sep-2025
Summary: Ms F complained the Council misinformed her about her father’s Community Infrastructure Levy relief application and failed to properly communicate and apply her requested reasonable adjustments. She said as a result she experienced unnecessary distress and had financial costs. We found no fault by the Council. It reached decisions in line with the relevant regulations and had regard to her reasonable adjustments when it became aware of her request.