Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 54124 results

  • NHS Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes Integrated Care Board (23 011 903b)

    Statement Upheld Community hospital services 29-Sep-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complained about Milton Keynes Council, Milton Keynes Integrated Care Board and First Option Healthcare in relation to the care of her son, Y. She has said the faults in care led to distress for her and her family. We found fault with Milton Keynes Council, Milton Keynes Integrated Care Board and First Option Healthcare, leading to distress and risk of harm which Mrs X has described. We have made recommendations which the organisations have agreed to carry out to address this injustice.

  • First Option Healthcare (23 011 903c)

    Statement Upheld Disabled children 29-Sep-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complained about Milton Keynes Council, Milton Keynes Integrated Care Board and First Option Healthcare in relation to the care of her son, Y. She has said the faults in care led to distress for her and her family. We found fault with Milton Keynes Council, Milton Keynes Integrated Care Board and First Option Healthcare, leading to distress and risk of harm which Mrs X has described. We have made recommendations which the organisations have agreed to carry out to address this injustice.

  • First Option Healthcare (23 011 903d)

    Statement Upheld Disabled children 29-Sep-2025

    Summary: Mrs X complained about Milton Keynes Council, Milton Keynes Integrated Care Board and First Option Healthcare in relation to the care of her son, Y. She has said the faults in care led to distress for her and her family. We found fault with Milton Keynes Council, Milton Keynes Integrated Care Board and First Option Healthcare, leading to distress and risk of harm which Mrs X has described. We have made recommendations which the organisations have agreed to carry out to address this injustice.

  • Ribble Valley Borough Council (25 011 144)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 28-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax enforcement because the complainant has commenced legal action against the Council.

  • North Lincolnshire Council (25 011 351)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School admissions 28-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s school’s admissions appeal panel refusing her appeal. It is unlikely we would find fault which caused Mrs X to lose out on a school place.

  • Reigate & Banstead Borough Council (25 011 583)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 28-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax liability because it relates to a body out of jurisdiction there is ultimately a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal.

  • Manchester City Council (25 011 764)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 28-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about liability for Council tax because there is a right of appeal to a Valuation Tribunal.

  • Hart District Council (25 012 010)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 28-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Mr X’s complaint regarding flags placed on his local high street. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to result in finding fault with the Council’s actions.

  • Torbay Council (25 012 248)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Private housing 28-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council refused to take enforcement action against his landlord. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

  • Cornwall Council (25 012 994)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 28-Sep-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr C’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice he received for an alleged parking contravention. This is because it was reasonable for Mr C to put in an appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings