Local Government Ombudsman Logo

www.lgo.org.uk has experienced a problem

The website has encountered an error. The issue has been logged so that we can investigate the cause.

You can visit the home page and try browsing again. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.

You may still be able to use our online complaint service if you want to register a complaint or log into your account.

SearchResult - Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 52300 results

  • Essex County Council (24 019 278)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 31-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Education, Health and Care plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to an appropriate remedy for the injustice caused by the delay.

  • Essex County Council (24 019 356)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 31-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about delays in the Education Health and Care Plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to apologise to Miss X and pay her £100 per month for the delay. We consider this an appropriate remedy and further investigation is therefore unlikely to achieve anything more.

  • Essex County Council (24 019 389)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 31-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about delays in the Education Health and Care Plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to apologise to Miss X and pay her £100 per month for the delay. We consider this an appropriate remedy and further investigation is therefore unlikely to achieve anything more.

  • Leeds City Council (24 019 507)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Housing benefit and council tax benefit 31-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a housing benefit overpayment because the complainants could have appealed to the tribunal.

  • North Norfolk District Council (24 019 554)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Leisure and culture 31-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council responded to the complainant’s request for a reasonable adjustment regarding use of a swimming pool. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Essex County Council (24 019 664)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 31-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about delays in the Education Health and Care Plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to apologise to Mrs X and pay her £100 per month for the delay. We consider this an appropriate remedy and further investigation is therefore unlikely to achieve anything more.

  • Manchester City Council (24 019 757)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 31-Mar-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint that the Council placed her child in an unsuitable residential home. This is because we have no jurisdiction to look at court decisions.

  • Milton Keynes Council (24 017 099)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Charging 31-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about charges for care and a deprivation of assets decision. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

  • Willowbrook Healthcare Limited (24 017 287)

    Statement Upheld Other 31-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the care provider’s handling of her late father’s continuing health care application. This is because the care provider agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused.

  • Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council (24 017 409)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Charging 31-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the amount the Council assessed him as having to contribute towards the cost of his care and support, about the Council passing his debt to an enforcement agent, and about cutting his care and support hours. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings