Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 52967 results

  • London Borough of Waltham Forest (25 000 712)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Building control 10-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a building control matter. This is because it is unlikely we could achieve a worthwhile outcome for the complainant.

  • London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham (25 000 960)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 10-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about contact arrangements. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault causing a significant injustice. The Information Commissioner is better placed to deal with concerns about data protection matters.

  • Cornwall Council (25 000 985)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Charging 10-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council incorrectly assisting the Mrs X’s funding assistance needs. This is because there is no evidence that the Council’s calculations caused significant injustice.

  • Bedford Borough Council (25 001 101)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 10-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the actions of the Council relating to an incident that led to a substantiated safeguarding concern. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation. Another body is better placed than us to consider an alleged data breach. We cannot investigate the actions of a representative of a school.

  • Bedford Borough Council (25 001 130)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 10-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the actions of the Council relating to an incident that led to a substantiated safeguarding concern. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation. Another body is better placed than us to consider an alleged data breach. We cannot investigate the actions of a representative of a school.

  • West Northamptonshire Council (25 001 676)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 10-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mrs X’s complaint about delays in the Education, Health and Care Plan process. This is because the Council has agreed to pay her £100 per month for the delay. We consider this an appropriate remedy and further investigation is therefore unlikely to achieve anything more.

  • Sheffield City Council (25 001 739)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 10-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to apply a local land charge against the complainant’s property. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault. Also, Mr X had a legal right of appeal to the Residential Property tribunal, and it was reasonable to expect him to use it.

  • Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (25 001 989)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 10-Jul-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate Ms X’s complaint about the handling of her Jobseeker’s Allowance claim because it lies outside our jurisdiction. This is because the complaint is not about an administrative function of the Council. The Council is not responsible for the issues raised as it is about decisions made by the Department for Work and Pensions.

  • Worcestershire County Council (25 002 011)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Safeguarding 10-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint alleging staff failed to safeguard the complainant’s late relative. This is because the matter is being considered by the coroner, so, at present, there is no worthwhile outcome achievable.

  • London Borough of Croydon (25 002 092)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 10-Jul-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to taken enforcement action against a breach of planning control by the complainant’s neighbours. We have not seen sufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s actions.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings