Nottingham City Council (25 007 192)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s liability for damage to a property. There is a court remedy available which it is reasonable to expect Mr X to use, and there is not enough evidence of fault to justify us investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained that his property was damaged by Council tenants.
  2. Mr X said the Council should be liable for the damage and should ensure that the tenants do not cause damage in the future.
  3. Mr X wants the Council to provide an engineer to assess the damage and pay for repairs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council after his property was damaged. The Council said it was not liable as it had not been caused by its direct actions.
  2. We will not investigate this part of Mr X’s complaint. We cannot determine liability, this is for the court, so it is reasonable to expect Mr X to pursue the legal remedy available to him.
  3. Mr X also said the Council did not challenge its tenants properly about the damage.
  4. When Mr X reported the issue to the Council, it visited his home and offered advice. It also visited the tenants to inspect the property and offer advice.
  5. We will not investigate this part of Mr X’s complaint. As the Council responded to Mr X’s concerns, there is not enough evidence of fault to justify us investigating.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is a court remedy that is reasonable for him to use, and there is not enough evidence of fault to justify us investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings