Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 56922 results

  • Birmingham City Council (25 026 376)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Housing benefit and council tax benefit 07-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a council tax account. Any injustice Mrs X has experienced is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

  • Lewes District Council (25 028 086)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 07-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about enforcement of a Council tax debt because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

  • London Borough of Havering (25 028 888)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 07-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of two penalty charge notices. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault and the Council has taken suitable steps to remedy the injustice Mr X claims. It is therefore unlikely we could achieve anything more for Mr X.

  • London Borough of Havering (25 029 213)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 07-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s representations against a penalty charge notice. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Wiltshire Council (25 029 494)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Street furniture and lighting 07-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council damaging his property when it installed a streetlight nearby. This is because there is another body better placed to consider such matters and subsequently, we cannot achieve the outcome Mr X wants.

  • London Borough of Havering (25 029 563)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 07-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s issue and escalation of a penalty charge notice. This is because it would be reasonable for Mr X to apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre at Northampton County Court to take the process back to an earlier stage. There is also insufficient evidence of fault b y the Council to warrant investigation.

  • Plymouth City Council (25 030 477)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 07-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a parking penalty charge notice as it has been cancelled and any remaining injustice to the complainant is not sufficient to warrant our further involvement. The Information Commissioner's Office is best placed to deal with the complaint about the Council’s data handling.

  • Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (26 000 478)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Homelessness 07-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council placed him in unsuitable accommodation and refused his review request. Mr X has used his alternative remedy to the court. Therefore, we cannot investigate.

  • West Sussex County Council (25 002 286)

    Statement Upheld Residential care 06-Apr-2026

    Summary: Mr X complains on behalf of his father, Mr Y, the Council detained him against his will while it completed a Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards assessment. Mr X says this led to his father incurring unnecessary care home fees. We have found fault in the actions of the Council in relation to the information it supplied Mr Y. The Council has agreed to write to Mr X to issue an apology and pay a financial payment.

  • Derby City Council (25 004 429)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 06-Apr-2026

    Summary: The Council was not at fault. It did not delay issuing her child, Y’s Education, Health and Care (EHC) Plan. It issued the Plan in line with statutory timescales that applied from the moment it conceded Mrs X’s appeal to the Tribunal. The Council was at fault for taking four months to respond to Mrs X’s complaint at stage one causing Mrs X and Y uncertainty and avoidable distress. The Council has already apologised for the delay which is a suitable remedy. The Council was also at fault for a two-week delay in deciding whether it would assess Y but we find a two-week delay did not cause Mrs X a significant enough injustice.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings