Recent reports in this category are shown below:
-
London Borough of Bromley (24 017 171)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 04-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about matters related to the Council’s data handling. This is because it is reasonable to expect Miss X to take the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office for its consideration.
-
Breckland District Council (24 016 290)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Land 04-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the sale of land as the complaint is made late to us and there are not good reasons to investigate now.
-
Fareham Borough Council (24 013 187)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 04-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council ignored his service requests after it decided he was a vexatious complainant. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.
-
Birmingham City Council (24 014 439)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 04-Feb-2025
Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint that a neighbour blocked a private right of way to his property with a fence. This is because the primary issue is about a potential breach of a contract, which only a court can determine.
-
Isle of Wight Council (24 018 115)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 03-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council responded to Mr X’s subject access request. The Information Commissioner is better placed to deal with the matter.
-
North Northamptonshire Council (24 016 510)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 03-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s misleading automatic response message. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.
-
Manchester City Council (24 015 111)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Land 03-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions relating to Mr X’s ground rent charges, or its responses to Mr X’s request for financial information. Mr X has an alternative legal remedy for matters relating to leasehold disputes. And the Information Commissioner’s Office are a body better suited to deal with his complaint about the provision of information.
-
London Borough of Southwark (24 018 881)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 03-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about service charging billing to a leaseholder as it does not meet the tests set out in our Assessment Code. We have no remit to investigate, because it is about the Council’s management of its leasehold properties.
-
Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (24 018 984)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 31-Jan-2025
Summary: Mr X says the Council has breached his confidentiality and failed to record his complaint details properly. We will not investigate. This is because this complaint does not meet the tests set out in our Assessment Code on which complaints we should investigate. It is reasonable for Mr X to complain to the Information Commissioner’s office as it is better placed to investigate.
-
South Gloucestershire Council (24 019 059)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 31-Jan-2025
Summary: Mr X complains about the way the Council dealt with his FOI request about council tax charging. We will not investigate. This is because this complaint does not meet the tests set out in our Assessment Code on which complaints we should investigate. It is reasonable for Mr X to complain to the Information Commissioner’s office as it is better placed to investigate.