Leisure and culture

Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (19 012 438)

    Statement Upheld Leisure and culture 18-Jun-2020

    Summary: Mr S complains that the Council delayed in installing the agreed signage at the nearby recreation ground and that the new signage wrongly restricts dog-walkers access to the whole cricket pitch area. The Council was at fault in that it delayed installing signage and miscommunicated its intentions in respect of the wording. The Ombudsman considers that the replacement of the signage, once the Council has introduced a new Public Space Protection Order later this year, is a suitable response to Mr S's complaint.

  • Plymouth City Council (19 020 585)

    Statement Upheld Leisure and culture 15-Jun-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate Mr X's complaint about wet paint on a bench damaging his clothes. This is because the Council has now agreed to pay for the damage and so an investigation by the Ombudsman could not achieve anything more.

  • South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council (19 010 275)

    Statement Not upheld Leisure and culture 17-Apr-2020

    Summary: Mrs B is a member of a community group that works in a park. Mrs B complains the Council has not secured access for the community group to noticeboards in the park. Mrs B says her group cannot use the boards to advertise events. Mrs B also complains the Council demolished a building in the park after saying it had no immediate plans to do so. The Ombudsman has not found fault with the actions of the Council.

  • Somerset West and Taunton Council (19 013 383)

    Statement Upheld Leisure and culture 03-Apr-2020

    Summary: Mrs X complained on behalf of her son, Mr Y, that the Council mis-sold him a holiday. There was some fault at the booking stage of Mr Y's holiday, but the Council offered a suitable remedy. The Council was not at fault for Mr Y missing his flight and losing the money paid for his holiday.

  • Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council (19 009 674)

    Statement Not upheld Leisure and culture 12-Mar-2020

    Summary: The Ombudsman does not find fault with the way the Council responded to concerns Mr C raised about a pool at a country park.

  • Kent County Council (19 009 603)

    Statement Upheld Leisure and culture 06-Mar-2020

    Summary: The Council did not explain its reasons for refusing Ms B access to an adult education course. The Council will apologise and facilitate Ms B to re-sit the exam or take the course elsewhere, should she wish.

  • Birmingham City Council (19 008 456)

    Statement Not upheld Leisure and culture 05-Mar-2020

    Summary: Mr Y complained about the Council's inadequate response to an outbreak of a disease amongst wild birds at one of the Council's parks. He is also unhappy with the time taken for the Council to respond to his complaint. We have not found the Council at fault.

  • London Borough of Waltham Forest (19 009 865)

    Statement Not upheld Leisure and culture 27-Feb-2020

    Summary: Ms X complained the Council failed to provide an adequate response to her complaint about an incident she reported in the changing facilities at a leisure centre. The Council was not at fault. It investigated the matter in line with policy and provided Ms X with a satisfactory response to her complaint.

  • London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (19 009 161)

    Statement Upheld Leisure and culture 20-Feb-2020

    Summary: Ms D says the Council failed to adequately redress her complaint about a leisure facility. The Council had already accepted fault and offered redress. It has now offered an additional amount of financial redress. As such, the Ombudsman has upheld the complaint and completed the investigation.

  • Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (19 007 853)

    Statement Upheld Leisure and culture 18-Feb-2020

    Summary: Mrs B complained the Council failed to properly investigate her concerns about the actions of her daughter's swimming teacher. There is no fault in the investigation but there is fault in some procedural matters, failing to keep proper records and failing to tell Mrs B the outcome of the investigation. That undermined Mrs B's confidence in the investigation and led to her going to time and trouble to pursue her complaint. An apology, letter to Mrs B to explain the outcome of the investigation, payment to Mrs B and a reminder to officers and the leisure centre is satisfactory remedy for the injustice caused.

Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.