Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Mansfield District Council (24 011 382)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 03-Dec-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way a Council officer spoke to Mr X during a telephone call. This is because an investigation is unlikely to add to that already carried out by the Council and there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.
-
Wealden District Council (24 015 370)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 03-Dec-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s responses to Mr X’s request for information about Council staff. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. There is insufficient evidence of fault causing injustice to warrant an investigation.
-
Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council (24 010 152)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 03-Dec-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about public procurement processes because there is not enough evidence of fault to warrant an investigation. There are also other bodies better placed to consider parts of Mrs X’s complaint. It would be reasonable to expect Mrs X to go to court if she considers the Council has acted unlawfully.
-
Nottingham City Council (24 014 606)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 02-Dec-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with Mr X’s concerns about health and safety issues in his building. This is because the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met for three main reasons. Firstly, there is insufficient evidence of fault with the way the Council carried out a building inspection. Secondly, the Information Commissioners Office is better placed to consider complaints about the Council’s decisions not to share information with Mr X. Finally, there is no evidence of any injustice to Mr X by the Council’s decision to issue selective licences to leaseholders.
-
North Northamptonshire Council (24 014 663)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 28-Nov-2024
Summary: Mrs X says the Council breached her confidentiality by telling someone that she had complained to the Council on behalf of the other person. We will not investigate. This is because this complaint does not meet the tests set out in our Assessment Code on which complaints we should investigate. We are unlikely to find enough evidence of fault plus it is reasonable for Mrs X to complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office if she considers her personal data has been breached.
-
East Suffolk Council (24 014 288)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 27-Nov-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a data protection breach. That is because the Information Commissioner’s Office is best placed to respond to complaints about the handling of personal information.
-
London Borough of Hillingdon (24 014 492)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 27-Nov-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Mr X’s request for information as it is best dealt with by the Information Commissioner’s Office.
-
London Borough of Hillingdon (24 011 572)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 27-Nov-2024
Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council failing to respond to information requests. The Information Commissioners Office is better placed to deal with the complaint.
-
Oxford City Council (24 014 174)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 26-Nov-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council reporting the complainant to the Police. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.
-
Lancashire County Council (24 013 616)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 26-Nov-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s involvement in matters concerning the care of Mr X’s child. This is because the issues could reasonably have been or have been mentioned in court proceedings. The Information Commissioner is better placed to deal with complaints about data protection matters.