Decision search
Your search has 51456 results
-
Birmingham City Council (24 005 881)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 08-Sep-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Penalty Charge Notices and the involvement of bailiffs. This is because there were appeal rights the complainant has or could have used.
-
Kent County Council (24 006 146)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 08-Sep-2024
Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to provide information she requested in a subject access request. This is because this is a complaint about a data matter which is best considered by the Information Commissioner’s Office.
-
Norfolk County Council (24 007 694)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Trading standards 05-Sep-2024
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s trading standards decision not to take specific further action. It is unlikely we would find its actions have caused Mr X a significant injustice. And it is reasonable to expect him to contact the Information Commissioner’s Office about a Freedom of Information request.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 05-Sep-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about standard committees because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 05-Sep-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with the complainant’s planning application and the pre-application advice it provided. This is because the complainant has appealed to the Planning Inspector. It is unlikely we would find fault in relation to the remaining issues complained about.
-
Fenland District Council (24 008 430)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 05-Sep-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a complaint about the conduct of a councillor and the decision to approve a planning application. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. The complainant is complaining on behalf of a Parish Council and not as a member of the public.
-
London Borough of Islington (24 009 669)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Managing council tenancies 05-Sep-2024
Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council sending the complainant’s mail to the wrong address. This is because the complainant is a leaseholder of the Council.
-
Westminster City Council (24 006 635)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 05-Sep-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a coroner. The coroner’s actions were as part of the coroner’s functions, and were not an administrative function of the Council. The matters complained about are therefore not within the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction.
-
Mansfield District Council (24 006 847)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 05-Sep-2024
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage caused to Mr X’s property by refuse collection crews. He has made an insurance claim against the Council for his losses. Where no liability is accepted it is reasonable to challenge the claim in the courts. The Council has apologised for bad language by refuse staff which Mr X reported.
-
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (24 007 046)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 05-Sep-2024
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his planning application, which it refused. This is because it would have been reasonable for Mr X to appeal against the decision to the Planning Inspector.