Decision search
Your search has 54124 results
-
Liverpool City Council (25 010 838)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 22-Oct-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to comply with a ruling made by the Information Commissioner’s Office. This is because this complaint relates to personal data and is a matter best dealt with by the Information Commissioner’s Office.
-
Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (25 012 575)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Leisure and culture 22-Oct-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about how he was treated at a Council leisure centre. The Council upheld Mr X’s complaint and provided an appropriate remedy so further investigation would not add to the one carried out by the Council.
-
Transport for London (25 013 226)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Licensing 22-Oct-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about taxi licensing because the complaint is late without good reason to exercise discretion to investigate it now and it is reasonable to expect Mr Y to have appealed to the court about the matter.
-
South Gloucestershire Council (25 014 436)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 22-Oct-2025
Summary: We will not investigate how the Council dealt with a member conduct complaint as we cannot achieve the outcome the complainant seeks.
-
Greater London Authority (25 015 386)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 22-Oct-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Authority’s handling of a member conduct complaint as Mr X Is not personally impacted by this to a degree that would warrant our further involvement.
-
Transport for London (25 016 288)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 22-Oct-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice for an alleged road charging scheme contravention. This is because it was reasonable for Mr B to make formal representations, and if needed, appeal to London Tribunals.
-
Buckinghamshire Council (24 012 873)
Statement Upheld Special educational needs 22-Oct-2025
Summary: There was delay in completing a phase transfer review of an Educational, Health and Care Plan and fault in the way a Council transferred the Plan to a new authority when Y moved home. This caused unnecessary time, trouble, distress and Y missed out on three weeks of college. The Council will apologise, make a symbolic payment and service improvements. The complaint is upheld.
-
Kent County Council (24 016 694)
Statement Not upheld Special educational needs 22-Oct-2025
Summary: There was no fault by the Council. There was no obligation to consider Ms X’s request for a personal budget because Y’s Education Health and Care Plan was not being reviewed. The Council advised Ms X how to apply for free school meals, which she is now receiving and secured special educational provision by putting in place tuition. This is in line with its legal duty.
-
Northumberland County Council (24 016 778)
Statement Upheld Special educational needs 22-Oct-2025
Summary: The Council was at fault for taking too long to assess Mrs X’s child, W, for an Education, Health and Care Plan and for failing to give a potential school for W accurate information about their needs. This meant W missed out on some special educational provision they should have had. To remedy W’s injustice, the Council will apologise, make a symbolic payment and issue a staff reminder.
-
Plymouth City Council (24 018 235)
Statement Upheld Antisocial behaviour 22-Oct-2025
Summary: Miss X complained about the Council’s response to her reports of noise, anti-social behaviour and light nuisance from a nearby business. We have found the Council at fault in wrongly closing Miss X’s original report but consider the action it has already taken provided a suitable remedy to Miss X. The Council has also agreed further action to avoid a reoccurrence.