Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 50710 results

  • South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council (24 004 536)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 17-Jul-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council considered Mr X’s request to change its records and provide him with information. This is because there is another body better placed to deal with his complaint and it would be reasonable for him to make a complaint to that body. Nor will we investigate how the Council communicated with Mr X over this matter because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 004 567)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 17-Jul-2024

    Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the Council’s child protection investigation in relation to the complainant’s child, as well as its decision to initiate care proceedings in court. This is because we have no legal jurisdiction to investigate a complaint where the issues raised are subject to court proceedings.

  • Brentwood Borough Council (24 005 038)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 17-Jul-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council’s Monitoring Officer dealt with a complaint about the conduct of councillors. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.

  • Surrey County Council (24 003 971)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 17-Jul-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a child and family assessment. This is because there is no sign of fault in the Council’s decision not to consider his complaint whilst there are ongoing family court proceedings.

  • Kent County Council (24 005 139)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries School admissions 17-Jul-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about an unsuccessful appeal for a school place. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault for us to be able to question the panel’s decision.

  • Mole Valley District Council (24 005 612)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 17-Jul-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because the complainant has not suffered any significant injustice as a result of the alleged fault.

  • Medway Council (24 006 460)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 17-Jul-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about data recorded about the complainant and his family by the Council in a assessment document. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. There is no evidence of fault in the Council’s actions and the Information Commissioner is better placed to consider.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 005 792)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 17-Jul-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to refund a Clean Air Zone charge. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 006 003)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 17-Jul-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with the complainant’s request for information. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate as this is a matter best dealt with by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

  • London Borough of Redbridge (24 006 703)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 17-Jul-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms B’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice she received for an alleged moving traffic contravention. This is because it was reasonable for Ms B to put in an appeal to London Tribunals.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings