Decision search
Your search has 55884 results
-
London Borough of Islington (25 002 588)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 10-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about housing allocations. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the way the Council determined his housing priority banding which would warrant an investigation.
-
Gedling Borough Council (25 004 715)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 10-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with planning applications for a site near her property, and how it responded to her complaint. There is not enough evidence of Council fault to warrant us investigating. There is insufficient significant personal injustice caused to Mrs X to justify an investigation. We also cannot achieve the key outcomes she seeks. We do not investigate councils’ complaint-handling where we are not investigating the issues which gave rise to the complaint.
-
Stroud District Council (25 006 466)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 10-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with wate and littering. Further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.
-
Horsham District Council (25 006 804)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Licensing 10-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal of a wild animal licence as it is reasonable to expect Mr X to have appealed the decision to the Magistrates’ Court.
-
South Gloucestershire Council (24 010 920)
Statement Upheld Alternative provision 10-Nov-2025
Summary: There was fault by the Council, because it did not arrange alternative provision for a child who could not attend school, and the Council has agreed to offer a financial remedy to reflect his loss of education. The Council was also at fault because of a delay in responding to the complaint, but this did not cause an injustice.
-
Kent County Council (24 011 893)
Statement Upheld Special educational needs 10-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of an Education, Health and Care Plan. The Council has offered a suitable remedy, and the dispute about special educational provision carried a SEND Tribunal right which it was reasonable for Miss Y to use.
-
Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council (24 012 171)
Statement Upheld Special educational needs 10-Nov-2025
Summary: Miss X complained that the Council failed to provide appropriate support for her daughter, J. We find that the Council failed to issue a final Education, Health and Care Plan, failed to ensure J received all the provision set out in her Plan, and failed to ensure she received the support it had identified she needed as a child in need. The Council has agreed to apologise, make payments to Miss X and J, and issue a final Plan without further delay. It has also agreed to make service improvements.
-
London Borough of Haringey (24 013 837)
Statement Upheld Disabled children 10-Nov-2025
Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to increase the direct payment for Mr Y. We found fault as there was no review of Y’s payment. This caused avoidable uncertainty about the outcome. The Council will apologise and make a symbolic payment.
-
Cambridgeshire County Council (25 006 938)
Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 10-Nov-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about in home care quality and charges. The Council have offered a suitable remedy.
-
Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (25 006 965)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Alternative provision 10-Nov-2025
Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint about lack of education provision as Miss X has issued judicial review proceedings against the Council. It is reasonable to expect Miss X to complete the Children Act complaints procedure once court proceedings end.