Local Government Ombudsman Logo

www.lgo.org.uk has experienced a problem

The website has encountered an error. The issue has been logged so that we can investigate the cause.

You can visit the home page and try browsing again. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.

You may still be able to use our online complaint service if you want to register a complaint or log into your account.

SearchResult - Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 52233 results

  • City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (24 016 971)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 10-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to introduce charges for residents’ parking permits on the street where he lives. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

  • Cheshire East Council (24 016 997)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 10-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision that new homes built behind the complainant’s home are built in line with approved plans and according to Council policy. We consider there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation. And that further investigation will not lead to a different outcome.

  • Liverpool City Council (24 017 089)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 10-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about her child, Y’s Education, Health and Care Plan annual review process. It is unlikely we could add to the Council’s response or achieve a different outcome.

  • South Norfolk District Council (24 017 296)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Council tax 10-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council issuing a misleading council tax demand. There is insufficient evidence of fault which has caused any significant injustice to warrant an investigation.

  • Kent County Council (24 017 317)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 10-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her request for an Education, Health and Care Plan. It was reasonable for Mrs X to use her right of appeal. Subsequent delays by the Council and issues with communication did not cause a personal injustice significant enough to warrant our involvement.

  • Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (24 017 323)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Homelessness 10-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the suitability of temporary accommodation offered by the Council to Mr X in 2024. It was reasonable for him to request a review of the offer and to appeal the decision to the court if unsuccessful.

  • Manchester City Council (24 017 417)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 10-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s actions after it received a complaint about Miss X from a market trader. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

  • London Borough of Bromley (24 017 506)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Trees 10-Mar-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate most of Miss X’s complaint about damage caused to her wall in 2021 by a Council owned tree because it is reasonable for her to take the matter to court. We cannot investigate matters prior to 2024 because the complaint is late. There is insufficient evidence of delay in 2024 to warrant an investigation. The Information Commissioner’s Office is better suited to consider Miss X’s complaint about data processing.

  • North Warwickshire Borough Council (24 017 565)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 10-Mar-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of his planning application. This is because Mr X has appealed against the Council’s decision to refuse the application.

  • Transport for London (24 017 785)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Public transport 10-Mar-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint that he was overcharged by a taxi driver licensed by Transport for London. This is because the complaint does not concern an administrative function of the authority.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings