Decision search
Your search has 53192 results
-
London Borough of Tower Hamlets (24 003 768)
Statement Upheld Other 10-Aug-2025
Summary: Mr X complained the Council’s investigation of a complaint he made through the statutory children’s complaint process, was flawed at both stage two and stage three. The Council was at fault as the statutory complaint procedure was flawed. The Council will apologise to Mr X for the avoidable frustration and uncertainty he was caused and conduct a new investigation of his complaint.
-
West Sussex County Council (24 011 785)
Statement Upheld Alternative provision 10-Aug-2025
Summary: Mrs X complained the Council delayed arranging alternative educational provision for her child, Y when he was unable to attend school. She also complained the Council failed to provide the specialist provision outlined in Y’s Education Health and Care (EHC) Plan. The Council decided without fault that the school named in the Plan could meet Y’s needs. The specialist provision was available to Y at the named school. However, the Council was at fault for a three month delay in arranging alternative education provision and failing to review Y’s EHC Plan within statutory timescales. The Council has agreed to apologise and make a payment for Y’s missed provision and to recognise the distress, frustration and uncertainty caused.
-
London Borough of Southwark (24 018 801)
Statement Upheld Allocations 10-Aug-2025
Summary: We found fault on Mr Y’s complaint about the Council failing to properly consider his review requests about his banding and his temporary accommodation’s suitability. It did not show it properly made the decision about his banding following an independent medical advisor’s recommendation. Nor did it show it properly investigated his concerns about the suitability and condition of his accommodation. There were failures to tell him about how to challenge decisions. The Council agreed to send a written apology, pay £200 for the avoidable distress caused, review his banding, review suitability, as well as reminding officers of the need to follow the correct procedures.
-
Vale Of White Horse District Council (24 019 037)
Statement Upheld Planning applications 10-Aug-2025
Summary: Mr B complained that the Council delayed excessively in registering a planning application to regularise breaches of planning control on a site including Mr B’s property and had failed to take enforcement action over a number of years. We found the Council delayed excessively in progressing the current application. The Council has agreed to apologise to Mr B and pay him £150.
-
London Borough of Redbridge (24 019 409)
Statement Upheld Homelessness 10-Aug-2025
Summary: Mrs Z complained that the Council failed to act promptly after deciding her temporary accommodation was unsuitable. We have concluded our investigation with a finding of fault. Based on the evidence, the Council delayed completing the suitability review and in offering suitable alternative accommodation and failed to address identified safety adaptations. This caused avoidable uncertainty and left Mrs Z living in unsuitable conditions for longer than necessary. The Council has accepted our recommendations.
-
Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council (24 019 644)
Statement Upheld Homelessness 10-Aug-2025
Summary: Ms D complained the Council delayed dealing with her homelessness application. I have found evidence of fault by the Council. The Council has already made service improvements and has agreed to our recommendations to pay Ms D redress for the delay.
-
London Borough of Bromley (24 019 831)
Statement Upheld Special educational needs 10-Aug-2025
Summary: Ms X complained that the Council delayed updating her daughter’s special educational needs support. We have found that the Council was at fault. It took more than two years longer than it should have done to update the support. It has agreed to apologise to Ms X and make symbolic payments to recognise the injustice to her and her daughter.
-
Essex County Council (24 022 730)
Statement Upheld Special educational needs 10-Aug-2025
Summary: Miss X complained the Council did not follow the correct timescales in the Education, Health and Care process. Due to the delays she reported, the Council told her that she could commission her own Educational Psychologists report. After she did this, Miss X said the Council told her that it would not use the report as it was commissioning its own. We find the Council at fault, which caused Miss X injustice. The Council agreed to make payments and apologise to Miss X.
-
Staffordshire County Council (25 000 608)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Charging 10-Aug-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint the Council did not complete a financial assessment correctly. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault. In addition, the fault accepted has not caused any significant injustice.
-
London Borough of Ealing (25 000 832)
Statement Upheld Other 10-Aug-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council not providing her with section 117 aftercare following her discharge from hospital. This is because the Council agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused by the likely fault.