London Borough of Harrow (25 012 730)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice and the integrity of the Council’s parking enforcement agents. This is because it is reasonable to expect him to have appealed the Penalty Charge Notice using the appeal process available. The second part of his complaint is premature because the Council has invited Mr X to use its complaints process and it is reasonable to expect Mr X to do this before coming to us.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains that the Council has refused to take his complaint about the behaviour of its enforcement agents through the complaints process.
  2. He would like the Council to investigate his complaint and cancel the Penalty Charge Notice (PCN)

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint unless we are satisfied the council knows about the complaint and has had an opportunity to investigate and reply. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to notify the council of the complaint and give it an opportunity to investigate and reply. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(5), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complains about the integrity or behaviour of the Council’s enforcement agents. He would like the Council to investigate his complaint and cancel the PCN.
  2. Whilst I note his concerns, I can see that the Council have already invited Mr X to use its complaints process if he would like to complain about the behaviour of the enforcement agents. Therefore, this part of his complaint is premature, and it is reasonable to expect Mr X to go through the Council’s complaint process before coming to us.
  3. I can also see that the Council has already advised Mr X that he can challenge the PCN using the appeal process. I find it reasonable to expect Mr X to use the appeal process that is available to him.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because part of it is premature and he can use the appeal process to challenge the PCN.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings