King's Lynn & West Norfolk Council (25 012 166)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Penalty Charge Notices because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complained the Council rejected his representations against two Penalty Charge Notices before he was contacted by enforcement agents who wanted him to pay a total of £470. Mr Y feels this was unjustified because he disagrees with the PCNs being issued.
  2. Mr Y says the issue has caused him considerable stress and he struggled financially to pay the £470 and is looking for his money back.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mr Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr Y disputes the validity of the PCNs the Council has issued. He has now paid the penalties, despite his disagreement with it, instead of using his right to appeal it to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. If Mr Y has felt that the PCNs were not valid in any way, it is for him as the driver and recipient of the PCNs to challenge this.
  2. In deciding not to appeal and paying the penalty, Mr Y has legally accepted his liability for the penalties and the validity of the PCNs. As he has accepted their validity, it is unlikely we would now find fault in the Council’s issuing or enforcement of the PCNs. We will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings