Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 50055 results

  • Somerset Council (23 020 705)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 30-Oct-2024

    Summary: Mrs X complains the Council delayed in putting in place an education other than at school package for her daughter, Y. The Council is at fault as it delayed in delivering elements of Y’s education other than at school package and did not arrange face to face tuition for Y as agreed. These faults caused Y to miss some education provision for three terms and caused distress to her and Mrs X. The Council has agreed to remedy this injustice by making a symbolic payment of £1800 to Y and a symbolic payment of £500 to Mrs X.

  • Lancashire County Council (23 020 866)

    Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 30-Oct-2024

    Summary: There is no evidence of fault by the Council in the way it dealt with Mr X's care arrangements. It acted properly and in accordance with the law. There is no fault in the charges levied for Mr X’s residential stay. There is fault in the way the Council dealt with Mrs X’s complaint. It delayed in responding and failed to address all points of complaint.

  • London Borough of Newham (23 020 975)

    Statement Upheld Homelessness 30-Oct-2024

    Summary: We found the Council at fault for its response when Mrs D sought its support when she faced being made homeless. The Council delayed in making decisions and failed to communicate with her. This caused Mrs D avoidable distress. The Council has accepted these findings and at the end of this statement we set out what action it will take to remedy this injustice and make service improvements.

  • Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council (24 002 749)

    Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 30-Oct-2024

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council’s delay in assessing his care needs and the adequacy of his subsequent care and support plan. The Council accepts it delayed in assessing Mr X and failed to carry out a proper assessment. The Council has agreed to apologise to Mr X, carry out a new assessment and make a payment to Mr X to recognise the care costs he incurred as a result of its delay.

  • West Berkshire Council (24 002 771)

    Statement Not upheld Child protection 30-Oct-2024

    Summary: Mr X complained about how the Council carried out Child Protection proceedings for his child, placed restrictions on how he should contact the Council, and considered his request for reasonable adjustments for his disability. He said this caused him avoidable distress and affected the outcome of Child Protection proceedings. We have ended our investigation. Since Mr X complained to us, the court granted an interim care order so his child could be temporarily taken into care and his child has since been sectioned under the Mental Health Act. Therefore, there is nothing further we could achieve. For the remaining parts of Mr X’s complaint, our view is further investigation will not result in a finding of fault, or a different or worthwhile outcome.

  • East Riding of Yorkshire Council (24 006 991)

    Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 30-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about adult social care planning. We are satisfied with the Council’s actions to accept fault and learn from the complaint. It is unlikely we would add to the Council’s investigation or achieve a different outcome.

  • Essex County Council (24 007 047)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 30-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about delays in producing an Education Health and Care Plan as the Council has agreed to a proportionate way to resolve the complaint.

  • London Borough of Ealing (24 007 338)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Charging 30-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council failing to provide a refund of a particular amount for care costs. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault that a refund of this amount was actually owed.

  • Essex County Council (24 007 422)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 30-Oct-2024

    Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to end her daughter’s Education Health and Care Plan because she has appealed this decision. Nor will we investigate the other parts of her complaint because they either relate to the appeal, or the Council has already satisfactorily addressed them.

  • Willowbrook Healthcare Limited (24 007 572)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Residential care 30-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Care Provider has responded to Mrs X’s concerns about her mother’s care. Investigation by the Ombudsman would not result in a different outcome, as the Care Provider has already addressed the issues and there is insufficient evidence its actions caused significant injustice.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings