Local Government Ombudsman Logo

www.lgo.org.uk has experienced a problem

The website has encountered an error. The issue has been logged so that we can investigate the cause.

You can visit the home page and try browsing again. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.

You may still be able to use our online complaint service if you want to register a complaint or log into your account.

SearchResult - Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 52463 results

  • Birmingham City Council (24 020 337)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 30-Mar-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about penalty charge notices because Mr Y has already appealed to the Traffic Enforcement Centre.

  • London Borough of Newham (24 021 006)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 30-Mar-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because the complainant appealed to the tribunal.

  • Hertfordshire County Council (24 021 110)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 30-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an unsuccessful application for a dropped kerb. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (24 021 143)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 30-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about congestion in a car park. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

  • London Borough of Hounslow (24 022 643)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 30-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Fixed Penalty Notice that the Council issued Mr X for littering. This is because the Council has cancelled the fine so further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

  • West Northamptonshire Council (24 022 884)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Housing benefit and council tax benefit 30-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about housing benefit and council tax reduction. It is reasonable to expect Miss X to use, or to have used, her tribunal appeal rights. It is reasonable to expect Miss X to take court action for the alleged damage to her health. It would be disproportionate to investigate other parts of the complaint in isolation.

  • Royal Borough of Greenwich (24 022 939)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Managing council tenancies 30-Mar-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint about Council tenancy fraud. This is because we cannot investigate complaints about the management of social housing by councils acting as a social landlord.

  • Surrey County Council (24 022 996)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Highway repair and maintenance 30-Mar-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss B’s complaint that she tripped and suffered injuries due to the Council’s failure to make a road safe during roadworks. This is because it is reasonable for Miss B to pursue her compensation claim by taking the Council to court.

  • Slough Borough Council (24 002 891)

    Statement Upheld Special educational needs 30-Mar-2025

    Summary: Ms X complained about delays and faults by the Council in its administration and review of her son’s Education, Health and Care Plan. We found the Council was at fault for delay in updating the plan; in carrying out an assessment and in reimbursing her for the cost of an occupational therapy assessment. These faults caused significant distress to Ms X and her son. The Council has accepted these findings. At the end of this statement, we set out action it has agreed to take to remedy this injustice and improve its service.

  • Medway Council (24 004 243)

    Statement Not upheld Antisocial behaviour 30-Mar-2025

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council did not act on his reports of anti-social behaviour, noise nuisance and bonfire nuisance from his neighbour. We did not find evidence of fault by the Council.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings