Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
London Borough of Ealing (25 017 264)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 17-Mar-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because he has the right to appeal to the London Tribunals.
-
London Borough of Camden (25 020 111)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 17-Mar-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice issued by the Council. If Mr X had wished to challenge the penalty charge notice it would have been reasonable for him to make representations to the Council and appeal to London Tribunals, and if Mr X believes he missed his opportunity to do so due to fault by the Council it would have been reasonable for him to apply to the Traffic Enforcement Centre to take the process back to an earlier stage. I have seen no evidence of fault by the Council in the issue of the penalty charge notice or affecting Mr X’s right to appeal against it.
-
London Borough of Islington (25 020 127)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 17-Mar-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a penalty charge notice. This is because the Council has agreed to cancel the penalty charge notice and it is unlikely investigation would achieve anything more for Mr X.
-
Transport for London (25 020 212)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 17-Mar-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to justify investigating and any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.
-
London Borough of Ealing (25 018 596)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 16-Mar-2026
Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because Ms Y has already appealed to the Traffic Enforcement Centre about the matter.
-
Birmingham City Council (24 021 268)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 16-Mar-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision on Mr X’s vehicle crossing application. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigation.
-
Southampton City Council (25 029 356)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 16-Mar-2026
Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice for an alleged parking contravention. This is because it is reasonable for Mr B to put in an appeal to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.
-
London Borough of Lambeth (25 014 398)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 16-Mar-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s representations against a penalty charge notice. This is because the Council has agreed to reduce the amount of the penalty charge back to the discounted rate of £65 and any remaining injustice Mr X has is not significant enough to warrant investigation.
-
London Borough of Newham (25 018 489)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 13-Mar-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because it is reasonable to expect Mr Y to approach the Traffic Enforcement Centre and the London Tribunals.
-
London Borough of Lambeth (25 022 524)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 13-Mar-2026
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s penalty charge notice. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.