What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (26 006 775)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council handled a request for information. This is because there is another body better placed to handle this complaint. We will also not investigate the Council’s complaint handling. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate how the Council dealt with this complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has not provided information he requested about Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs). He is also unhappy with how the Council responded to his complaint. Mr X says this has been time consuming and has caused distress. Mr X would like the Ombudsman to review the complaint response and consider whether the Council are correctly enforcing PCNs.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X received a PCN. He was unhappy about this, and asked the Council for information about how it deals with PCNs. He is unhappy with the response provided by the Council. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is the independent authority on data protection and information rights and is therefore best placed to determine if the Council ought to have provided the information Mr X requested from it. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to complain to the ICO therefore and as such, we will not investigate.
  2. Mr X is also unhappy with how the Council dealt with his complaints. It is not a good use of public money to investigate how a Council dealt with a complaint where we are not investigating the substantive matter. Therefore, we will not investigate the Council’s complaint handling.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is another body better placed to handle this complaint and it is not a good use of public resources to investigate how the Council dealt with this complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings