What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

London Borough of Havering (26 009 638)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council wrongly enforced a traffic penalty charge notice as it is unlikely we will find fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council increased the cost of a traffic penalty charge notice (PCN) when it sent her a charge certificate, despite, Miss X says, her having entered into a payment agreement with the Council to pay off the PCN. Miss X says this has caused her stress and a financial burden.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X paid the first instalment of a payment arrangement to pay off a PCN but made no further payments as she believed the Council would automatically collect the subsequent payments.
  2. In its complaint responses, the Council explained it was Miss X’s responsibility to ensure payments were made in accordance with the agreed payment schedule. The Council said its instalment system does not provide a facility for automated payments and no indication of such was given when Miss X made her first payment manually. Miss X would have needed to make the further payments the same way.
  3. I recognise that Miss X has been impacted by the increased PCN cost but we will not investigate as it is unlikely we will find fault by the Council. When the payment arrangement was not complied with, the Council was entitled to continue the enforcement of the PCN, as it explained in its complaint responses to Miss X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it is unlikely we will find fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings