Child protection


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • London Borough of Waltham Forest (25 012 678)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 28-Apr-2026

    Summary: We cannot investigate part of Mrs X’s complaint about concerns relating to her child’s school because the issues raised relate to the internal management of a school, and the law says we cannot investigate. We will not investigate the Council’s investigation into a safeguarding concern because there is insufficient evidence of fault. We will not investigate the Council’s complaint handling because the tests in our Assessment Code are not met.

  • London Borough of Havering (25 005 294)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 28-Apr-2026

    Summary: We cannot investigate Miss X’s complaint that the Council lied in court. The law prevents us from investigating complaints about what happened in court.

  • Oxfordshire County Council (25 017 945)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 28-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about how the Council dealt with a child protection referral. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation by the Ombudsman.

  • Herefordshire Council (25 019 180)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 28-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of the children’s statutory complaints procedure. Some of the complaint is late. For the remainder, it was reasonable for Mrs X to ask the Council to review her complaint, there is not enough evidence of fault in its decision to close her complaint, and the Information Commissioner is better placed to consider and decide complaints about data protection.

  • Somerset Council (25 019 337)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 28-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council failed to act appropriately to safeguard the complainant’s child. This is because the complaint has already been substantially upheld and investigation by the Ombudsman would achieve nothing significant.

  • Newcastle upon Tyne City Council (26 002 359)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 28-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about children services’ actions. We are unlikely to find fault on some elements. We will not reinvestigate the complaint and are unlikely to add to the Council’s reply. We would not achieve Ms X’s aims.

  • Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council (25 008 419)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 27-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s preparation of a section 7 report. The law prevents us from investigating such matters and there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s refusal of his complaint. Mr X’s other concerns about his confidentiality and subject access request are better addressed with the Information Commissioner’s Office.

  • North Lincolnshire Council (25 017 211)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 27-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s care of her family members. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council considered her concerns and we cannot investigate matters the Court has considered.

  • London Borough of Ealing (25 018 162)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 27-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the accuracy of a children services child and family assessment. The Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider this disagreement.

  • Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (25 018 982)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 27-Apr-2026

    Summary: We will not investigate part of Mr X’s complaints about the Council’s response to his Subject Access Request and right to rectification because the Information Commissioner is better suited to consider the matter. We will not investigate Mr X’s concerns about how the Council considered his evidence relating to a safeguarding concern because the Council addressed the issues through its complaints handling and an investigation is unlikely to achieve anything further. We will not investigate information shared with the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service because the issue was likely considered during court proceedings.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings