Norfolk County Council (24 013 810)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to appropriately safeguard Mrs X’s children whilst in foster care. This is because an investigation would not lead to a different outcome for Mrs X.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X made several complaints regarding the Council’s safeguarding of her children whilst in foster care.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained to the Council about its management of her children’s foster care arrangements. Among other things she raised concerns about the Council’s safeguarding and the contact allowed between her and the children.
  2. The Council investigated Mrs X’s complaint in line with the children’s statutory complaints procedure and did not uphold most Mrs X’s complaints apart from the delay in completing the investigation.
  3. Mrs X remains unhappy with the Council’s action and wants us to find it at fault. The Ombudsman will not investigate matters the Council has already considered if there is no significant fault in the process followed. The evidence shows the Council has carried out a competent statutory investigation into the concerns raised. The delay in completing the investigation did not cause Mrs X significant injustice. An investigation into this matter would therefore be unlikely to result in a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because an investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings