Kingston Upon Hull City Council (25 006 465)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Mr X’s contact with children’s services. The complaint is late, and there are no good reasons why we should consider it. Additionally, the Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider his complaint about a Subject Access Request.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained that Council officers made inaccurate statements about him, that led to other Council officers incorrectly labelling him as a domestic abuser.
  2. Mr X said that the Council has incorrectly processed his Subject Access Request (Data Protection Act 2018), and withheld documents from him.
  3. Mr X also said that the Council’s actions has caused him to feel depressed, and enabled his former partner to prevent his children having contact with him.
  4. Mr X wants the Council officers concerned to face disciplinary procedures, including dismissal, and for his Subject Access Request to be properly processed.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The events that gave cause to Mr X’s complaint took place in 2023. This is longer than 12 months ago. I have not seen any good reasons that would persuade me to exercise discretion to investigate this complaint now.
  2. The Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider Mr X’s complaint about how the Council has processed his Subject Access Request. It is my understanding that Mr X has already approached them about this issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is late, there are no good reasons to consider it now, and the Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider his complaint about a Subject Access Request.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings