Local Government Ombudsman Logo

www.lgo.org.uk has experienced a problem

The website has encountered an error. The issue has been logged so that we can investigate the cause.

You can visit the home page and try browsing again. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.

You may still be able to use our online complaint service if you want to register a complaint or log into your account.

SearchResult - Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 52604 results

  • Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council (24 008 221)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Antisocial behaviour 16-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to act on reports of noise nuisance. There is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council responded to Mrs X’s reports. And, as the Council cannot consider her concerns without her engagement, further investigation by us would not lead to a different outcome.

  • South Cambridgeshire District Council (24 007 727)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 16-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s consideration of noise when determining the complainant’s planning applications. It is reasonable to expect him to have used his right of appeal to the Planning Inspector, and we will not pursue any concerns about the complaints process in isolation.

  • Brighton & Hove City Council (24 007 788)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 16-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council including incorrect information in a safeguarding report. Further investigation will not lead to a different outcome.

  • Cornwall Council (24 007 862)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 16-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of planning applications for a site next to the complainant. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

  • London Borough of Newham (24 010 463)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 16-Oct-2024

    Summary: We cannot investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to secure a school placement for her child. This is because Mrs X appealed the matter to a tribunal.

  • Norfolk County Council (24 010 595)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 16-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s delay in issuing an Education, Health and Care Plan. The complaint is late and there is no good reason to consider it now.

  • West Lindsey District Council (24 010 773)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 16-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council provided him with an incorrect email address regarding his request for a review of his Freedom of Information (FOI) enquiry. This is because an investigation by the Ombudsman is unlikely to achieve any additional outcome.

  • West Northamptonshire Council (24 010 999)

    Statement Upheld Council tax 16-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a delay by the Council in issuing a council tax bill. This is because the Council has provided a satisfactory response.

  • London Borough of Sutton (24 011 096)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 16-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s Education, Health and Care needs assessment process. Any injustice suffered is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

  • Castle Point Borough Council (24 011 110)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 16-Oct-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council wrongly calculated the additional floor space created by development which it says is liable for the community infrastructure levy. This is because the issue carries a right of appeal to the Valuation Office Agency which it would have been reasonable for him to use. We cannot in any event decide whether the Council, or Mr X, is correct in their calculations and we cannot therefore determine the issue at the heart of the complaint.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings