Local Government Ombudsman Logo

www.lgo.org.uk has experienced a problem

The website has encountered an error. The issue has been logged so that we can investigate the cause.

You can visit the home page and try browsing again. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.

You may still be able to use our online complaint service if you want to register a complaint or log into your account.

SearchResult - Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Decision search

What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 55054 results

  • Birmingham City Council (24 020 758)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 06-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Penalty Charge Notices because it is reasonable to expect Mr Y to appeal to the Traffic Enforcement Centre, Traffic Penalty Tribunal and Information Commissioner.

  • Cambridgeshire County Council (24 020 861)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Child protection 06-Apr-2025

    Summary: We cannot investigate Ms X’s complaint about evidence and reports provided to and considered by the court in proceedings relating to her grandchild because it lies outside our jurisdiction. The law prevents us from investigating complaints about matters that have been considered in court. We have no discretion to do so.

  • London Borough of Barnet (24 020 907)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 06-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Mr X’s complaint about an insecure structure. This is because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by us investigating.

  • Dorset Council (24 020 987)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Councillor conduct and standards 06-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a complaint about the conduct of a councillor. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.

  • West Oxfordshire District Council (24 008 867)

    Statement Upheld Disabled facilities grants 06-Apr-2025

    Summary: Miss B complained that the Council had failed to properly include her in the Disabled Facilities Grant (DFG) application process leading to a poorly finished outcome which differed from the approved plans and was unsafe. We found fault causing injustice to Miss B. The Council has agreed to apologise to her, pay her £500 and carry out a site visit to determine what outstanding works are required. It has also agreed to remind staff of the Council’s responsibility to ensure the DFG work is completed in accordance with the approved plans and meets the applicant’s needs.

  • London Borough of Barking & Dagenham (24 009 172)

    Statement Upheld Charging 06-Apr-2025

    Summary: We have found fault with the Council for its poor communication with Mr X about his adult son’s (Mr Y’s) care contributions. This caused Mr X and his family avoidable distress. The Council agreed to remedy this injustice.

  • Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council (24 009 413)

    Statement Not upheld Planning applications 06-Apr-2025

    Summary: Mr B complained the Council wrongly granted planning permission for a development which breaches its policy and, in doing so, failed to consider his objections. Mr B says as a result he experiences noise nuisance. I found no fault in how the Council considered the application.

  • Dorset Council (24 009 608)

    Statement Upheld Assessment and care plan 06-Apr-2025

    Summary: Mrs B complained the Council wrongly refused to award a 12 week property disregard when her mother moved into a care home and failed to properly assess her mother’s needs properly. There is no fault in the Council’s care assessment. The Council failed to follow statutory guidance when refusing to award a 12 week property disregard and failed to follow its own policy. That caused Mrs B distress. An apology, payment to Mrs B and reminder to officers is satisfactory remedy.

  • Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council (24 009 635)

    Statement Upheld Charging 06-Apr-2025

    Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s failure to backdate his personal budget to 8 April, when he moved out of the family home. The Council failed to consider exercising its discretion to allow Mr X to employ his mother as his personal assistant when he was still living with her. But this did not cause injustice to Mr X as there were other option open to him. Nevertheless, the Council has plans to take action which will ensure officers are aware of the scope to exercise the Council’s discretion.

  • Birmingham City Council (24 011 059)

    Statement Upheld School transport 06-Apr-2025

    Summary: Ms X complained the Council declined her applications for her child’s travel assistance since they started secondary school. We found fault with the Council failing to consider the full circumstances of Ms X’s applications. The Council agreed to consider an application for travel assistance for Ms X’s child referring to Ms X’s evidenced mobility issues and her child’s episodes of unconsciousness. The Council also agreed to apologise to Ms X and considers its discretion to reimburse any costs Ms X has incurred in arranging travel to school for her child since September 2024, if the Council accepts the travel assistance application.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings