Local Government Ombudsman Logo

www.lgo.org.uk has experienced a problem

The website has encountered an error. The issue has been logged so that we can investigate the cause.

You can visit the home page and try browsing again. Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused.

You may still be able to use our online complaint service if you want to register a complaint or log into your account.

SearchResult - Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman

Decision search


What's this ?
  • Organisation
  • Decision type

  • Reference number
  • Date range

     

  • Sort Results

Show advanced search

Your search has 55054 results

  • Birmingham City Council (24 019 191)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 21-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council delayed replacing a damaged refuse bin. This is because the bin has now been replaced so an investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

  • Buckinghamshire Council (24 020 688)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 21-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to serve a planning Enforcement Notice on the complainant. This is because he has appealed to the Planning Inspector.

  • West Suffolk Council (24 020 727)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 21-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the management of a council meeting. This is because the issues raised have not caused the complainant a significant enough personal injustice.

  • South Staffordshire District Council (24 020 801)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Refuse and recycling 21-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an alleged obstruction to the complainant’s property caused by the Council’s bin collection contractor, or its collection point. This is because any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

  • London Borough of Haringey (24 020 887)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 21-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a moving traffic penalty charge notice as the complainant had the right to ask the court to consider their case.

  • Essex County Council (24 021 261)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Special educational needs 21-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council allegedly colluding with a school. The complaint is ancillary to matters we have already considered and declined to investigate in complaint 24 017 444. Investigating this matter would be unlikely to lead to any worthwhile outcome.

  • Worcestershire County Council (24 021 283)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 21-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about an alleged data breach by the Council. This is because complaints about data matters, such as this, are best considered and decided by the Information Commissioner’s Office.

  • Norwich City Council (24 021 957)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 21-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to increase priority banding on his housing application. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

  • Manchester City Council (24 022 409)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Parking and other penalties 21-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice. There is not enough evidence of fault, and the injustice is not significant enough to warrant further investigation. We could not add to any previous investigation and further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

  • London Borough of Wandsworth (24 022 562)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 21-Apr-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision it was not liable for a personal injury claim after Miss X said it was negligent. This is because Mrs X has an alternative legal remedy through the courts, and it would be reasonable to expect her to use this alternative remedy.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings