Archive has 97 results
-
Selby District Council (21 017 329)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Licensing 25-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the actions of the Council connected to the issuing of a premises licence. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. The complainant had a right of appeal to the Magistrate’s Court.
-
London Borough of Waltham Forest (21 017 244)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Licensing 22-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s arrangements for payment of selective licences. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions. Nor would further investigation lead to a different outcome.
-
Herefordshire Council (21 016 725)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Licensing 10-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s actions while carrying out an inspection of her business for licensing purposes. This is because Ms X’s main concern relate to a data protection issue and the Information Commissioner is better placed to consider it.
-
Bromsgrove District Council (21 006 098)
Statement Upheld Licensing 10-Mar-2022
Summary: Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of his complaints about noise nuisance, antisocial behaviour, and breach of licence conditions regarding a pub near his property. We find fault with the Council for not properly considering Mr X’s complaints about antisocial behaviour. We do not find fault with the Council’s actions in relation to Mr X’s complaints about noise nuisance and breach of licence conditions. We have made recommendations.
-
London Borough of Bexley (21 015 994)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Licensing 10-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of matters relating to the use of premises close to Ms X’s home. This is because the premises are not currently in use and an investigation would serve no useful purpose at this stage.
-
Great Yarmouth Borough Council (21 016 325)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Licensing 09-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to issue Ms X a fine for not having a selective licence for her rental property. That is because there is insufficient evidence of fault in how the Council made that decision to warrant further investigation.
-
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Licensing 08-Mar-2022
Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council made changes to his business licence causing loss of income. Mr X has appealed to the Magistrates Court. Mr X also has legal remedies, it is reasonable for him to use, if he wishes to challenge a noise abatement notice or claim damages for defamation.
-
Vale of White Horse District Council (21 016 907)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Licensing 07-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a change in the Council’s Taxi Policy affecting a licence renewal because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.
-
Sunderland City Council (21 015 984)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Licensing 04-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council will not take action to prevent a catering van trading on an industrial estate. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our further involvement.
-
Bassetlaw District Council (21 016 389)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Licensing 03-Mar-2022
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the wording in the license for a permanent mobile home site. That is because the Council has already agreed to review the wording therefore further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.