Great Yarmouth Borough Council (21 016 325)

Category : Environment and regulation > Licensing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to issue Ms X a fine for not having a selective licence for her rental property. That is because there is insufficient evidence of fault in how the Council made that decision to warrant further investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained about the Council’s decision to issue her a fine for not having a selective licence for a property she rents out. She said she does not live in the area so was not aware the Council was introducing selective licencing. She wants the Council to reimburse the fine.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council introduced selective licencing in January 2019. That required private rental landlords within a specific area to be licensed. If landlords had not licensed their property by July 2019, the Council applied a £1000 fine to each licence application.
  2. Ms X did not licence her rental property within the required timeframe and the Council issued her a fine. Ms X appealed that decision. The Council did not uphold that appeal. It said it sent letters to known rental properties in the area and publicised the introduction of the scheme. It said Ms X had a responsibility to keep up to date with any local news that might impact on her rental property.
  3. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint further, as there is not enough evidence of fault in how the Council communicated the introduction of selective licencing or in how the Council considered Ms X’s appeal.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings