Advice on comparing statistics across years

In 2022-23 we changed our investigation processes, contributing towards an increase in the average uphold rate across all complaints. Consider comparing individual council uphold rates against the average rate rather than against previous years.

In 2020-21 we received and decided fewer complaints than normal because we stopped accepting new complaints for three months due to Covid-19.

Chelmsford City Council

Annual statistics ?Find out more about annual statistics

  • Complaints upheld

    0% of complaints we investigated were upheld.

    This compares to an average of 63% in similar authorities.

    0 upheld decisions

    Adjusted for Chelmsford City Council's population, this is
    0 upheld decisions per 100,000 residents
    .

    The average for authorities of this type is
    1.2 upheld decisions per 100,000 residents.

    View upheld decisions

    Statistics are based on a total of 1 investigations for the period between 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

  • Compliance with Ombudsman recommendations

    No recommendations were due for compliance in this period

  • Satisfactory remedies provided by the Council

    The Ombudsman did not uphold any complaints in this period

Annual letters

We write to councils each year to give a summary of the complaint statistics we record about them,
and their performance in responding to our investigations.

View annual letters

Reports ?Find out more about reports

In the last nine years, the Ombudsman has published the following reports against Chelmsford City Council

No reports published

Service improvements ?Find out more about service improvements

Since April 2018, the Council has agreed to make the following improvements to its services following an Ombudsman investigation. We list up to 10 cases below – click ‘view all’ if there are more.

Case reference: 24 004 452

Category: Housing

Sub Category: Homelessness

  • Look at what procedures it has in place to consider reasonable adjustments. The Council should identify why the adjustments Mr X needed were not picked up in his case and consider what measures it can put in place to ensure similar issues are not missed in the future.

Case reference: 22 001 492

Category: Housing

Sub Category: Homelessness

  • The Council agreed to remind its housing advice staff that they should consider whether it is reasonable for people who apply as homeless to continue to occupy property they are entitled to, including whether the property is affordable for them.

2

Service improvements agreed by Chelmsford City Council

View all

Last updated: 4 April 2015

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings