Interpreting our complaints data
This information covers the statistics included in our annual complaint reviews for 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18. For previous years, see our note on interpreting local authority statistics 2008 - 2012.
This is the number of complaints and enquiries we received within a given period. You should be cautious when using these statistics to monitor the performance of organisations within our jurisdiction. This is because the number of new cases we receive doesn’t simply depend on the number of problems people have with local services. There are lots of other factors to consider. For example:
- Demographics. An organisation that serves a large population is likely to see more complaints reach us. This could also influence the kind of complaints that are made to us. For example, a community that includes a high proportion of older people may raise more complaints about adult social care services.
- Local conditions. Sometimes, one-off events can generate multiple complaints about the same organisation. For example, we might receive several complaints from people who oppose a council’s decision to grant planning permission for a large housing development.
- Expectations. Not everyone who receives a poor service goes on to raise a complaint with us and some people are less likely to complain than others. So a fall in the number of received complaints may reflect lower expectations rather than an improvement in services.
- Signposting. A high number of received complaints might reflect an organisation that is good at letting people know they can ask us for an independent investigation.
This is the number of decisions we make on the cases we see. It is important to know that not all complaints and enquiries are appropriate to investigate. We report our decisions by the following outcomes:
- Invalid or incomplete. We were not given enough information to consider the issue.
- Advice given. We provided early advice, or explained where to go for the right help.
- Referred back for local resolution. We found the complaint was brought to us too early because the organisation involved was not given the chance to consider it first.
- Closed after initial enquiries. We assessed the complaint but decided against completing a full investigation. This might be because the law says we’re not allowed to investigate it, or because it would not be an effective use of public funds if we did.
- Upheld. We completed a detailed investigation and found evidence of fault, or we found the organisation accepted fault early on.
- Not upheld. We completed a detailed investigation but did not find evidence of fault.
Our uphold rate shows how often we find organisations get things wrong. It is expressed as a percentage of the detailed investigations we complete.
When we find fault in the way an organisation carries out its duties, we consider whether this caused an injustice to the person who was affected. If so, we make recommendations about what the organisation should do to put things right.
- Complaints remedied by authority. This is the number of cases in which we decided that, while it did get things wrong, the organisation took satisfactory action to remedy the injustice caused.
- Complaints remedied by LGO. This is the number of cases which required our direct intervention to put things right for the person who was affected.