Transport for London (26 017 035)

Category : Transport and highways > Traffic management

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about the enforcement of a Penalty Charge Notice, and the imposition of Ultra Low Emission Zone charges. The law prevents us from investigating as X has applied to the Traffic Enforcement Centre to seek to regain their appeal rights. X can then appeal to London Tribunals.

The complaint

  1. X says the Authority failed to follow the correct procedure for a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) and denied them their right to appeal against it. They say the matter has wrongly progressed through the enforcement procedure.
  2. X says their vehicle is Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) compliant, and so ULEZ charges and related PCNs have been wrongly issued.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes limits on what we can investigate.
  2. The courts have said that where someone has sought a remedy by way of proceedings in any court of law, we cannot investigate. This is the case even if the appeal did not or could not provide a complete remedy for all the injustice claimed. (R v The Commissioner for Local Administration ex parte PH (1999) EHCA Civ 916)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  4. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for the rest of England. The Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC), part of the county court, considers applications to set the PCN process back where there has been procedural fault.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information from X, and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint because X has applied to the Traffic Enforcement Centre to regain their appeal rights and may then appeal if the TEC agrees.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings