Traffic management


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (23 016 038)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 23-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s rejection of a request for parking restrictions on the road where Miss X lives. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

  • Transport for London (23 010 251)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 23-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the authority’s misapplication of the Low Emission Zone charge to a vehicle which should have been exempt. This complaint was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mrs X could not have complained to us sooner.

  • City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (23 015 991)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 21-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to refuse the complainant’s application for a grant under the Clean Air Programme. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (23 003 038)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 21-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Mr X’s concerns about road safety in his locale. This is because an investigation is unlikely to lead to a useful outcome and FOI matters can reasonably be appealed to the Information Commissioner and so fall outside our jurisdiction.

  • London Borough of Haringey (23 017 931)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 15-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a blue badge parking policy as the injustice claimed by the complainant does not arise directly from this but from the issuance of a parking penalty charge notice by a different authority and this can be remedied by an appeal to London Tribunals.

  • Leicester City Council (23 015 058)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 14-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a request for parking restrictions to be implemented. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Transport for London (23 013 614)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 12-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about Transport for London’s policy for discounts and exemptions to charges for its ultra-low emission zone, which he believes is discriminatory. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by Transport for London. The evidence shows the authority had due regard to its duties and obligations under the Equality Act 2010 and only the courts can determine whether the policy is discriminatory.

  • London Borough of Haringey (23 014 517)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 08-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to provide information related to a consultation which had been requested by Mr X before the end of the consultation period. This is because an investigation is unlikely to add to that already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.

  • City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council (23 015 094)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 08-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to remove the complainant’s Clean Air Zone exemption. This is because we are unlikely to find fault by the Council.

  • Westmorland and Furness Council (23 015 164)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 08-Feb-2024

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision that it will not provide a loading bay outside his business premises. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings