Traffic management


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • City of York Council (17 011 782)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 20-Nov-2017

    Summary: Ms X complains about the Council's refusal to grant her an individual parking space closer to her home in a restricted parking zone. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. There is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council's part which has caused injustice to Ms X.

  • Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council (17 011 691)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 20-Nov-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council has failed to deal with problems caused by a set of traffic lights it installed. This is because the complaint has been made late.

  • Cheshire West & Chester Council (17 010 547)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 17-Nov-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the Council's decision not to introduce traffic restrictions near the complainant's home. It is unlikely he would find fault by the Council.

  • Transport for London (17 010 852)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 16-Nov-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about a penalty charge notice. This is because the complainant has followed the statutory process and can appeal to the tribunal.

  • Middlesbrough Borough Council (17 011 565)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 14-Nov-2017

    Summary: we will not investigate this complaint about the action the Council may take to control speeding along Mr X's road. It is unlikely we will find fault. And we cannot achieve the outcome Mr X would like.

  • Transport for London (17 007 908)

    Statement Upheld Traffic management 13-Nov-2017

    Summary: Mr X says the Council has not explained why his client's private car hire firm was subject to a compliance visit by TfL's officers in October 2016. There was fault by TfL because it did not adequately respond to Mr X's complaint and it handled the complaint process poorly. However, TfL did provide reasons for the compliance visit and so Mr X's clients did not suffer an injustice that warrants further pursuit of the complaint by the Ombudsman.

  • London Borough of Haringey (17 011 068)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 08-Nov-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council will not accept traffic management changes proposed by the complainant. It is unlikely he would find evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Transport for London (17 010 931)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 07-Nov-2017

    Summary: Mr X complained about the authority's employment of enforcement agents who clamped his car following non payment of the Congestion Charge. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. It was reasonable for Mr X to submit a witness statement to the Traffic Enforcement Centre. There is no evidence of fault on Transport for London's part.

  • Reading Borough Council (17 010 534)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 07-Nov-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council does not properly enforce limited waiting bays outside shops near the complainant's home. It is unlikely the Ombudsman would find evidence of fault causing the complainant significant personal injustice.

  • London Borough of Waltham Forest (16 015 322)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 07-Nov-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the cost of a parking permit for a van. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

;