Traffic management


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Transport for London (17 007 908)

    Statement Upheld Traffic management 13-Nov-2017

    Summary: Mr X says the Council has not explained why his client's private car hire firm was subject to a compliance visit by TfL's officers in October 2016. There was fault by TfL because it did not adequately respond to Mr X's complaint and it handled the complaint process poorly. However, TfL did provide reasons for the compliance visit and so Mr X's clients did not suffer an injustice that warrants further pursuit of the complaint by the Ombudsman.

  • London Borough of Haringey (17 011 068)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 08-Nov-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council will not accept traffic management changes proposed by the complainant. It is unlikely he would find evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Transport for London (17 010 931)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 07-Nov-2017

    Summary: Mr X complained about the authority's employment of enforcement agents who clamped his car following non payment of the Congestion Charge. The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint. It was reasonable for Mr X to submit a witness statement to the Traffic Enforcement Centre. There is no evidence of fault on Transport for London's part.

  • Reading Borough Council (17 010 534)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 07-Nov-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council does not properly enforce limited waiting bays outside shops near the complainant's home. It is unlikely the Ombudsman would find evidence of fault causing the complainant significant personal injustice.

  • London Borough of Waltham Forest (16 015 322)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 07-Nov-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the cost of a parking permit for a van. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Broxbourne Borough Council (17 010 564)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 03-Nov-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council decided not to introduce parking restrictions near the complainant's home. It is unlikely would find evidence of fault in how the Council made the decision.

  • Hertsmere Borough Council (17 001 212)

    Statement Not upheld Traffic management 03-Nov-2017

    Summary: In deciding not to impose parking controls in a residential area subject to high parking demand the Council acted without fault.

  • Stevenage Borough Council (17 010 061)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 01-Nov-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate how the Council has dealt with the complainant's concerns about parking near her home. It is unlikely he would find evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council (17 006 010)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 01-Nov-2017

    Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint that the Council will not prevent people parking outside the complainant's home. It is unlikely we would find evidence of fault by the Council.

  • Colchester Borough Council (17 010 106)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Traffic management 31-Oct-2017

    Summary: Mr X complained about the Council's failure to take action against indiscriminate parking outside his home. We should not investigate this complaint. There is insufficient evidence of fault on the Council's part which has caused injustice to Mr X.

;