Essex County Council (26 010 041)

Category : Transport and highways > Traffic management

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 15 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint about the Council’s handling of roadworks in her area. This is because Mrs B has not suffered a significant injustice which would justify public money being spent on an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mrs B complains Council roadworks blocked access to her road for two days even though no work was actually being done during this period. Mrs B says workers prevented deliveries being made to properties on her road and she suffered two days of missed deliveries. Mrs B would like the Council to accept it was at fault and apologise for the inconvenience she was caused.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. Our role is to consider complaints where the person bringing the complaint has suffered significant personal injustice as a direct result of the actions or inactions of the organisation. This means we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm, or distress as a direct result of faults or failures.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has explained that it had to use parts of Mrs B’s road to park vehicles and machinery during nearby highway works.
  2. The Council says it does not prevent access to properties and its traffic management staff would not have turned away a delivery.
  3. To form a view on what happened we would need to start an investigation. But, we must use public money carefully and focus our investigations on complaints of significant and serious injustice. The impact of these roadworks on Mrs B was for a relatively short period of time and an investigation into what happened would not be a good use of our limited resources.
  4. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs B’s complaint because she has not suffered a serious or significant injustice which would justify an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings