Transport for London (25 011 743)

Category : Transport and highways > Traffic management

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice for a road charging scheme contravention. This is because it was reasonable for Ms X to appeal to the London Tribunals.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains she was issued with a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) for driving through a chargeable route without paying the charge.
  2. She says she mistakenly made a payment to the wrong toll. Ms X explained that at the time she made her payment, she assumed she had paid the correct charge.
  3. Ms X also said the area is unknown to her as she does not live there.
  4. She would like Transport for London to waive the PCN. he Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Authority.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X was issued with a PCN for driving through a chargeable route without paying the charge. She said she made a payment online. However, her payment was for a different route. Ms X said her payment was accepted, and therefore she thought she had paid the correct charge.
  2. In response to her representations, Transport for London explained that the two routes have separate charging schemes. Therefore, the PCN remained due.
  3. Whilst I note Ms X’s concerns, she had a right of appeal to the London Tribunals, and I have seen no reason why she could not have exercised that right.
  4. The London Tribunals can decide if the PCN should be cancelled or not.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because she had a right of appeal to the London Tribunals and I consider it reasonable to expect her to exercise her appeal rights.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings