Northumberland County Council (24 018 520)

Category : Transport and highways > Traffic management

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a grass verge near the complainant’s home. This because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council made him remove boulders from the grass verge outside his home. He says he needs the boulders to protect his property and the verge from damage. He says boulders are often placed on verges and the Council has discriminated against him by making him remove them.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council. This includes the complaint correspondence and an update from the Council about repairs. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X placed boulders on a grass verge near his home to protect the verge and his property from damage. He says vehicles drive over the verge causing damage. The Council asked Mr X to remove the boulders because they were an obstruction.
  2. The Council is aware vehicles sometimes drive over the verge due to the road layout and it has, where appropriate, placed verge posts. The Council has also carried out a safety inspection, installed additional signs, and carried out a speed audit. The Council recently inspected the verge and, while there are no hazards, says it will do some edging repairs during the next financial year. The Council says damage to the verge is likely to re-occur due to the layout and volume of traffic. It explained it would not be possible to find out which vehicles cause the damage and there is no enforcement action it can take.
  3. I will not start an investigation because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. The verge is part of the highway which Mr X does not own. The power to install or remove boulders rests with the Council, not Mr X. This does not represent discrimination but rather that the Council will only place boulders where it is safe and appropriate.
  4. The Council is aware there are problems in the area but, as described above, the Council has taken action to address them. There is nothing to indicate we need to start an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings