Surrey County Council (24 020 294)

Category : Transport and highways > Traffic management

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 May 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council's handling of a petition as Mr X could have sought a formal review of this.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to properly consider a petition he submitted to it about a travel scheme.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council’s petition scheme explains that a review can be requested of how it responded to a petition, if such a request is made within 28 days of a formal response having been sent to the petition organiser. The Council says a formal response was sent to Mr X but he did not request a review.
  2. The petition scheme explains that a review will be considered by a scrutiny board and if that board considers the Council did not deal with a petition adequately, it may use any of its powers to deal with the matter, including making recommendations to Cabinet.
  3. While I recognise Mr X made a complaint, this was prior to the Council having supplied him with its formal response to the petition. At this point, it is reasonable to have expected Mr X to ask the Council for a review and for this reason, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because he had the right to ask the Council to review its handling of the petition and it is reasonable to expect him to have done so.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings