What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Kent County Council (26 009 161)

Category : Transport and highways > Street furniture and lighting

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to flags appearing in public spaces. This has not caused X significant enough injustice to warrant us investigating.

The complaint

  1. X complained about the Council’s response to unauthorised placement of flags on highway structures in its area. They said they had made multiple reports and got no response from the Council, including to their complaint.
  2. X was also unhappy the Council had apparently taken no action toward any reports it got about this matter, over a six-month period. X said they had spent a lot of their time chasing up the Council’s response and this caused them frustration.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In X’s area people have attached flags to street lighting columns and street furniture. X said the Council did not respond to them about this and they made a Freedom of Information request to the Council about this. Following this request, X said the Council had taken no action in relation to multiple reports on this issue.
  2. Our role is only to investigate complaints where the person complaining has suffered serious loss, harm or distress, directly because of the actions or inactions of the Council.
  3. I recognise X may find the flags concerning, but it is not for the Ombudsman to reach a judgement about the significance of a flag to some people but not to others. This means any distress X may experience from seeing the flags is not a significant enough injustice to warrant the Ombudsman using time and public money to investigate.  
  4. Nor will I investigate a complaint the Council did not properly follow its complaint procedures in X’s case. This is because it is not proportionate to investigate complaint handling faults, where we decide not to look at the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate X’s complaint because there is no significant injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings