What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Worcestershire County Council (26 001 998)

Category : Transport and highways > Street furniture and lighting

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to remove streetlights from a bridge. This is because any personal injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council removed streetlights from a bridge. He also complained about the lack of transparency in the Council's decision-making and consultation process. Mr X was disappointed and frustrated. He wants the Council to reinstate the streetlights and explain why it decided to remove them. He also wants the Council to make service improvements to prevent a recurrence of fault.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In mid-2025, the Council replaced the streetlights on a bridge with new streetlights.
  2. Mr X said the Council’s actions were wrong. He said the streetlights were historic and that they were on a listed bridge. He said the Council failed to obtain consent from the planning authority to replace them. Mr X wanted the Council to reinstall the previous streetlights.
  3. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. We recognise Mr X is disappointed and frustrated with the Council’s actions however, the personal injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because any personal injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings