Hampshire County Council (25 002 421)

Category : Transport and highways > Street furniture and lighting

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jul 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to reduce the brightness of streetlights along a road in the local area. This is because the alleged fault did not cause significant enough injustice to Mr X to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council has dimmed the brightness of street lighting along a road in the area to a level that is unsafe.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has explained the reasons it decided to dim the streetlights, and it is not for us to question its rationale. It told Mr X the road did not meet the requirements to leave the lights turned on more brightly and that the lighting levels are the same as other streets across the County. It also confirmed the police had not raised any concerns, but it would continue to note any issues caused by the reduced lighting levels. It is therefore unlikely we would find fault in the way the Council reached its decision.
  2. Mr X has complained the Council reducing the light levels has caused a general safety risk for the public, but he does not claim any significant personal injustice from the Council’s decision. The road is several miles away from Mr X’s property and although he has provided evidence to show he was made aware of the issue by someone who lives closer, he has not raised the complaint on their behalf. We must therefore look at the injustice caused to Mr X himself and this is not significant enough to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council or to show the Council’s decision caused Mr X significant enough injustice to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings