Manchester City Council (23 016 311)

Category : Transport and highways > Street furniture and lighting

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Feb 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a streetlight. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council and nothing we could add to the Council’s response.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mr X, complains that the streetlight outside his home is inadequate and leaves the path in semi-darkness. He wants the Council to alter the light so it shines on the street and path.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council. This includes the complaint correspondence. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about the streetlight outside his home. He said it is a new LED light which, unlike the old-style lamp, does not properly light the path outside his home.
  2. The Council visited Mr X’s street at night. The Council found the streetlighting is working correctly and lighting the street in accordance with the British Standards and Council specification. Despite finding no problems the Council added a tilt to the light and checked with its contractors that there is no further action it can take.
  3. I will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. The Council responded correctly by visiting the site, checking that the lights are working correctly and applying a tilt. I appreciate Mr X remains dissatisfied but there is nothing more we would expect the Council to do.
  4. In addition, as the Council has established the lights meet the specification and has checked with the contractor that there is no further possible outcome, then an investigation would not lead to a different outcome. We do not act as an appeal body and we cannot intervene simply because a council makes a decision that someone disagrees with.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council and an investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings